· Private foundation
Trust Uw David Tod Arrel
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $147k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION MAHONING VALLEY | $200,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN | $60,000 |
| INSPIRING MINDS YOUNGSTOWN | $50,000 |
| URSULINE SISTERS MISSION | $40,000 |
| RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY | $30,000 |
| MAHONING VALLEY COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM | $25,000 |
| BEATITUDE HOUSE | $25,000 |
| MAHONING VALLEY SOJOURN TO THE PAST | $15,000 |
| GREATER WARREN-YOUNGSTOWN URBAN LEAGUE I | $12,000 |
| OPERATION WARM INC | $7,000 |
| HUMILITY OF MARY HOUSING | $6,083 |
| STEM IS US 20 | $1,783 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $319k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCOMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +9%
- ANASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS6× · 2017–2022 · $953k · revenue +110%
- ACALTA CARE GROUP INC2× · 2023–2024 · $102k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- MAMayerson Academy for Human Resourcesone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -56%
- IFINC FAMILY & COMMUNITYone grant, 2023 · $30k
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THEone grant, 2022 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The united way of youngstown and the mahoning valley seeks to be the driving force behind sustained improvement in the lives of all our citizens, through initiatives that promote education, income, health, and community support services.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.
Yas strives to provide culturally competent mental health treatment, independent living skill development and care planning services in order to prevent out of home placement.
Leadership mahoning valley, inc. is a not-for-profit corporation located in youngstown, ohio. the corporation was formed in 1994 to identify individuals with diverse backgrounds and experiences who demonstrate leadership talent and…
UMCC is a not for profit organization affiliated with Global Ministries, consisting of persons of all faiths and providing diversified social services to the community. Its major emphasis is the need of young people their families in the…
The mission of youngstown umadaop, inc., is to prevent and reduce the misuse of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs, and other behavioral health issues across the lifespan by delivering innovative, culturally appropriate, evidence-based…
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
Catholic charities serving portage and stark counties shares the mission held by catholic charities usa: to provide service to people in need, advocate for justice in social structures, and call the entire church and other people of good…
To insure that all children living in the organization's service area will have the opportunity to experience positive mentoring relationships.
To support children and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beatitude House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Operation Warm Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 30% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMPASS FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ↗
- Who funds ALTA CARE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Inspiring Minds of Youngstown Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF YOUNGSTOWN ↗
- Who funds HEART REACH NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Mayerson Academy for Human Resources ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES REGIONAL AGENCY ↗
- Who funds URSULINE SISTERS MISSION ↗
- Who funds PASTORAL COUNSELING SERVICE OF SUMMIT CO ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS MOTIVATED BY THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MAHONING VALLEY COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR ↗
- Who funds KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSIDE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION FOR JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TRUMBULL COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PROJECT MKC ↗
- Who funds OHIO URBAN RENAISSANCE ↗
- Who funds MAHONING VALLEY SOJOURN TO THE PAST ↗
- Who funds KOOL BOIZ FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HUMILITY OF MARY HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Warren Youngstown Urban League ↗
- Who funds YWCA MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ALL CHILDREN LEARN DIFFERENTLY SCHOOL AND LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds DOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF MAHONING VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds SIGHT FOR ALL UNITED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · The William Swanston Charitable Fund · Ruth Beecher H XI Char Tw · The United Way of Youngstown and the Mahoning Valley · Youngstown Fdn General · Senator Maurice & Florence Lipscher Char · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Youngstown Area Jewish Foundation · James & Coralie Centofanti Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Trust Uw David Tod Arrel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.