· Private foundation
The Anthony J Fox Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROTESTANT FAMILY SERVICES | $6,500 |
| CANFIELD VILLAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $5,000 |
| CANFIELD GRIDIRON CLUB | $5,000 |
| BOARDMAN LOCAL SCHOOLS | $5,000 |
| RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY | $2,500 |
| AUTISM SOCIETY OF MAHONING VALLEY | $2,500 |
| PROJECT MKC | $2,000 |
| NE OHIO ADOPTION SERVICES | $1,500 |
| THE HELMS FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| HELP | $1,000 |
| THE BALOG FAMILY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPROJECT MKC5× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +137%
- NONORTHEAST OHIO ADOPTION SERVICES4× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +32%
- ASAutism Society of Mahoning Valley3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $13k
- TBTHE BOARDMAN LIONS CLUBone grant, 2020 · $10k
- YFYOUNGSTOWN FIGHTING LITTLE REDMENone grant, 2021 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
Youngstown area goodwill industries actively strives to achieve full participation in society of people with disabilities and special needs by expanding opportunities, capabilities, and independence.
Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.
To inspire a sense of wonder in the falls of the ohio region through education, preservation, and exploration.
Supervision for needy children
Leadership mahoning valley, inc. is a not-for-profit corporation located in youngstown, ohio. the corporation was formed in 1994 to identify individuals with diverse backgrounds and experiences who demonstrate leadership talent and…
Mission is to promote and advocate for the welfare of people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.
To insure that all children living in the organization's service area will have the opportunity to experience positive mentoring relationships.
Advocacy and protective services, inc. ("apsi") is an independent organization which advocates for outcomes that promote the dignity, respect and enhanced quality of life for individual persons with disabilities, primarily those with…
To promote the education and training of the manufacturing work force in northeast ohio and western pennsylvania. grant support to local manufacturers coalition in furtherance of the stated purpose.
To provide job support and behavioral care for adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.
Helping individuals who experience challengers posed by life's transitions, inspiring hope through protection, education, and advocacy. see schedule o for ursuline's vision.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beatitude House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Helms Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUNGSTOWN FDN GENERAL ↗
- Who funds PROJECT MKC ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Helms Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO ADOPTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Autism Society of Mahoning Valley ↗
- Who funds CANFIELD GRIDIRON CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds URSULINE SISTERS MISSION ↗
- Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HELP INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN STRING INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNGSTOWN PLAYHOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Youngstown Fdn General · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · The William Swanston Charitable Fund · W&H Bender Memorial Fund Xxxxx8005 · J Ford Crandall Depository · The Schwebel Family Foundation · Frances Schermer Charitable Trust 41-46496008 · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · Mahoning Valley Hospital Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Anthony J Fox Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.