· Private foundation
The Brocker Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $975k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $760k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TURNING POINT USA | $100,000 |
| SIM MEDICAL MISSIONS | $100,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $100,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $100,000 |
| MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE | $75,000 |
| DESTINY RESCUE | $75,000 |
| LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL | $60,000 |
| RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY | $50,000 |
| MCGREGOR BAPTIST CHURCH | $50,000 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $50,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $45,000 |
| BELLA WOMENS CENTER | $45,000 |
| CRYSTAL PEAKS YOUTH RANCH | $40,000 |
| MISSION OF HOPE HAITI | $35,000 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF SW FLORIDA | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $516k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Compassion International Incorporated9× · 2017–2025 · $425k · revenue +16%- RMRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY9× · 2017–2025 · $308k · revenue +31%
- LJLOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL9× · 2017–2025 · $260k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CMCHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCEone grant, 2021 · $5k
- SFSHEPHERDS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -6%
- LCLife Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Incone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…
The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bright Hope International and the most unlike its peers is Youngstown Blue Coats. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds LOVE JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC ↗
- Who funds Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co ↗
- Who funds BELLA WOMENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN POLICY ROUNDTABLE ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Family Legacy Missions International ↗
- Who funds YOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds A HEALING HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds JONI AND FRIENDS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · In His Steps Foundation · Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Brocker Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.