· Private foundation
Beautiful Feet Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMON GROUND CHURCH | $95,000 |
| RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY | $10,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $10,000 |
| TALK IS CHEAP | $5,000 |
| ROCK KIDZ UGANDA | $5,000 |
| LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS | $5,000 |
| ON TARGET OUTFITTERS | $5,000 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $3,956 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGGOODNESS GROWS4× · 2020–2024 · $42k · revenue +157%
- LFLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +27%
- MOMEN OF FAITH3× · 2021–2024 · $19k · revenue +24% · 46% of their budget
Funded once
- LILIFESONG INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +105%
- RMRBC MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +16%
- FOFOCUS ON FAMILYone grant, 2020 · $300
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
World outreach
To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost
To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations
Teaching the gospel/missions
Religious Purposes
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Religious
Religious
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Christian Mission and the most unlike its peers is Men of Faith. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMON GROUND CHURCH ↗
- Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds GOODNESS GROWS ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCK KIDZ UGANDA INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds MEN OF FAITH ↗
- Who funds Lifeline Christian Mission ↗
- Who funds ON TARGET OUTFITTERS ↗
- Who funds TALK IS CHEAP INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG INC ↗
- Who funds RBC MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beautiful Feet Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.