· Private foundation
The Essex Avenue Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $3.0M
- $250k+43 grants · $25M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ESCUELA COMUNITARIA DEL BRONX BRONX COMMUNITY SCHO | $1,895,108 |
| CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC | $1,000,000 |
| THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING | $1,000,000 |
| BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATI | $1,000,000 |
| WE CARE SOLAR | $750,000 |
| ALI FORNEY CENTER | $750,000 |
| HEALTH IN HARMONY INC | $750,000 |
| WOMEN IN NEED INC | $700,000 |
| JUBILEE JUSTICE INC | $700,000 |
| REFED INC | $700,000 |
| COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC | $700,000 |
| GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP | $625,000 |
| CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC | $600,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC | $580,000 |
| CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC | $530,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECESCUELA COMUNITARIA DEL BRONXBRONX COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC3× · 2022–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +299% · 55% of their budget
- TCTHE CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC4× · 2021–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +15%
Cornell University2× · 2021–2022 · $3.5M · revenue +23%
Funded once
- OGOYATE GROUPone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -1% · 38% of their budget
- GAGRID ALTERNATIVESone grant, 2023 · $400k
- BIBIG INITIATIVES INCORPORATEDone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…
Nyc bird alliance is a grassroots community that protects wild birds and habitat in the five boroughs, improving the quality of life for all new yorkers.
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Nyceec's mission is to deliver financing solutions and advance markets for energy efficiency and clean energy in communities.
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
Planet reimagined is on a mission to deliver fair solutions for people and the planet.the organization is a creative climate incubator using an innovative action research method to test, refine, and scale solutions. we bring together…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for Public Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ocean Professional Theatre Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 17% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ESCUELA COMUNITARIA DEL BRONXBRONX COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITY AND COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds BILLION OYSTER PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds REFED INC ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds Health in Harmony ↗
- Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds Solar United Neighbors Inc ↗
- Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
- Who funds OYATE GROUP ↗
- Who funds WILD LANDSCAPES INC ↗
- Who funds FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds University of Maine Foundation ↗
- Who funds RETHINK FOOD NYC INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PROJECT DRAWDOWN ↗
- Who funds GREEN CITY FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds CEC STUYVESANT COVE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
- Who funds SHOALS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOMA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE SURVIVOR FUND ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Robin Hood Foundation · City Parks Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Freedom Together Foundation · The Jm Kaplan Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Essex Avenue Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Essex Avenue Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Essex Avenue Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.