· Public charity
Soundwaves Art Foundation
We are a philanthropic foundation that makes original pieces of art by capturing the digital heartbeat of some of the world's most iconic music.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $705,127 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,187,493 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $482,366 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $140k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $507k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN IN CONFLICT | $224,165 |
| SWEET RELIEF MUSICANS FUND | $201,950 |
| KULTURECITY | $80,955 |
| BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC | $22,000 |
| THE BUSYHEAD PROJECT INC | $18,000 |
| UNICEF | $17,250 |
| SHARE OUR STRENGTH | $17,250 |
| THE SCARS FOUNDATION | $16,500 |
| GIBSON FOUNDATION | $14,750 |
| LIVING THE DREAM FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| MAKE YOURSELF FOUNDATION | $12,050 |
| PROPSECTS OPPORTUNITY INC | $10,000 |
| VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $9,750 |
| HOPE IN THE HILLS | $9,250 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $8,700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $437k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SUPPORT
Stated purpose: SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +305%
- KKultureCity5× · 2020–2024 · $189k · revenue +590%
- NFNotes For Notes Inc4× · 2017–2022 · $96k · revenue +208%
Funded once
- TNTHE NATIONALone grant, 2021 · $86k
- TSTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $51k · revenue -33%
- TNTHE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
Its mission is to bring joy and comfort, laughter and healing to children and young adults who are chronically or terminally ill. it does so through personalized songs that honor the child. its motto is: the medicine of music.
Hear Your Song empowers children and teens living with serious illnesses and complex health needs to make their voices heard through collaborative songwriting. At the heart of our work is a "kid-driven," totally individualized process that…
To advocate for and support living composers
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Musicares Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Makeyourself Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 24% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC ↗
- Who funds SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND ↗
- Who funds KultureCity ↗
- Who funds NORDOFF-ROBBINS MUSIC THERAPY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN MANHATTAN ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Notes For Notes Inc ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FARM AID INC ↗
- Who funds Looking Out Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE SIMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN CANCER AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE ON THE HILL INC ↗
- Who funds BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ETHERIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BUSYHEAD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds THE GIBSON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOULSVILLE CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HCF SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds THE GIBSON FOUNDATION GIBSON ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Living the Dream Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds MAKEYOURSELF FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT FESTIVALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH HOPES INC ↗
- Who funds PROSPECTS OPPORTUNITY AND ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE IN THE HILLS INCORPORATED HEALING APPALACHIA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Pledgeling Foundation · Gibson Gives Foundation Dba Gibson Gives · Bethel Woods Center for the Arts Inc · Ron and Lisa Brill Charitable Trust · PlusOnePlusOnePlusOne · Simple Generosity Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Soundwaves Art Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Farm Aid Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Soundwaves Art Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Soundwaves Art Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.