· Public charity
Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company Inc
To facilitate the development, construction, management, and operation of affordable housing facilities for low-income elderly and handicapped persons.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 36 grants below total $501,373 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $529,813 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,440 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $116k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $318k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WILLIAM G HELIS CHAPTER 310 ORDER OF AHEPA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $67,711 |
| AHEPA 78 CHARITIES INC | $32,976 |
| KULTURECITY | $30,000 |
| DAUGHTERS OF PENELOPE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $28,000 |
| AHEPA 29 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $27,590 |
| NATIONAL HELLENIC SOCIETY | $25,000 |
| AHEPA COLUMBIA FOUNDATION INC | $20,655 |
| HELLAS NATIONAL SOFTBALL TEAM | $20,000 |
| AHEPA 232 FOUNDATION INC | $18,906 |
| AHEPA 501 FOUNDATION INC | $16,488 |
| AHEPA 192 CHARITABLE TRUST | $15,719 |
| AHEPA NORWICH FOUNDATION INC | $15,169 |
| AHEPA ONE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $13,340 |
| PENELOPE 54 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $12,311 |
| AHEPA ROCHESTER FOUNDATION | $10,992 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPENELOPE HOUSE INC2× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
- CACINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +214% · 100% of their budget
- AHAHEPA HAVERHILL FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +129% · 99% of their budget
Funded once
- OVORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPSgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +373%
- HIHEALTH IMPERATIVES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the ancient Hellenic ideals of education philanthropy civic responsibility family and individual excellence through community service and volunteerism.
Provide academic scholarships and community assistance
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Ahepa Philanthropic Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Whiteman 4G Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AHEPA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM G HELIS CHAPTER 310 ORDER OF AHEPA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds KultureCity ↗
- Who funds ORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPS ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELLAS NATIONAL SOFTBALL TEAM ↗
- Who funds AHEPA 302 Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEALTH IMPERATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds AHEPA 113 Charitable Fund ↗
- Who funds AHEPA HAVERHILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PENELOPE 38 CHARITABLE TR ↗
- Who funds AHEPA 408 PHILANTHROPIES INC ↗
- Who funds AHEPA SYRACUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AHEPA ROCHESTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AHEPA CHAPTER NO 60 CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AHEPA GREENVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Whiteman 4G Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Imperatives Inc — 79% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.