Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ilitch Charities Inc

Provide support to children and family programs in the areas of health, recreation and education.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$618k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Recreation & Sports$3.5MYouth Development$1.1MCommunity Improvement$607kHealth$349kEducation$243kArts & Culture$217kPhilanthropy$179kEmployment$105kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 25 grants below total $1,610,815 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,959,708 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $348,893 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $244k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$13,750
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LCAHL$618,086
VARIOUS SOFTBALL-BASEBALL LITTLE LEAGUE CAMPS$406,742
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART - DETROIT$100,000
COLEMAN A YOUNG FOUNDATION$100,000
MARINERS INN$100,000
UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN$36,000
ALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS$30,906
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$26,147
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN$25,816
VARIOUS RECIPIENTS$25,067
MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY$24,843
FISHER HOUSE MICHIGAN$20,000
VARIOUS RECIPIENTS - ON THE FLY HOCKEY$13,750
DETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY$10,716
KINGMAN NORTH LITTLE LEAGUE$10,485
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KULTURE CITY: $24k → 16%CALVIN JOHNSON JR FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $7k → 21%THINK DETROIT PAL: $31k → 21%DETROIT PAL: $51k → 21%DETROIT PAL: $45k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
CA
MO
AZ
OK
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Ilitch Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 82% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ilitch Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.5M · 22 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
38

Total granted

$4.5M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+9%

Still filing today

73%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $834k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2023 · $233k · revenue +73%
  • BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $194k · revenue +44%
  • DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED
    3× · 2020–2022 · $127k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • ON
    OUR NEIGHBORHOODS FIRST
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • MG
    MEIJER GREAT LAKES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $137k
  • MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY
    one grant, 2022 · $104k · revenue -39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Athletic Club

To create life-enriching experiences that build meaningful relations, foster personal and professional growth, and celebrate culture in the heart of detroit.

2
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

4
Detroit Economic Growth Corporation

Promotion of activities to spur economic growth and revitalization in the city of detroit

5
Michigan High School Athletic Assoc

To conduct interscholastic athletic tournaments throughout the state, consistent with educational values of high school curriculums, to provide assistance in the training of coaches, athletic directors and officials, as well as the…

Education
6
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

7
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
8
Michigan Sports Alliance

To encourage michigan residents of all ages and abilities to live active and healthy lifestyles

Recreation & Sports
9
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Michigan State Youth Soccer Assoc

To foster the physical, mental and emotional growth and development of michigan's youth through the sport of soccer by providing the governing structure to administer youth soccer in the state of michigan and to provide information to…

Recreation & Sports
11
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

12
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Angels Share. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts Organizatio…Detroit Community Developme…Regional Economic Developme…Community Health and Suppor…Healthcare Systems and Serv…Construction Trade UnionsJewish Community Philanthro…Member Recreation ClubsAffordable Housing ProvidersYouth Sports ClubsIndependent School Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%16%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr12%24%35–55yr14%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%4%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr12%12%35–55yr14%16%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/63
the rest of the field
16%
4,783/29,681

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
34/58
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LCAHL — $1,590,908 · OtherLCAHLLEAGUE APPS - FALLSUMMER BASEBALL LITTLE LEAGUE CAMPS — $635,550 · OtherLEAGUE APPS - FALLSUMMER BASEBALL LITTLE LEAGUE CAMPSVARIOUS SOFTBALL-BASEBALL LITTLE LEAGUE CAMPS — $406,742 · OtherVARIOUS SOFTBALL-BASEBALL LITTLE LEAGUE CAMPSOUR NEIGHBORHOODS FIRST — $250,000 · OtherOUR NEIGHBORHOODS FIRSTIndividual grant recipient — $234,884 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS — $215,008 · OtherUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $171,000 · Other+30 more — $889,990 · Other+30 moreWAYNE COUNTY-DETROIT CDE INC — $441,310 · Community ImprovementWAYNE COUNT…EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 · Community ImprovementEASTERN MAR…WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT — $100,000 · Community ImprovementWAYNE STATE…+2 more — $15,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsMIGUEL CABRERA FOUNDATION INC — $95,262 · Recreation & SportsLITTLE CAESARS AAA HOCKEY CLUB — $67,000 · Recreation & SportsMotor City Veterans Hockey Association — $59,959 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $44,010 · Recreation & SportsEAST SIDE YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsCLARK PARK COALITION — $20,000 · Recreation & Sports+6 more — $33,580 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $133,662 · HealthMARINERS INN — $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $61,966 · HealthNFX — $15,000 · Health+3 more — $19,165 · HealthMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $104,375 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT — $100,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN SPORTS HALL OF FAME — $40,000 · Arts & CultureAngels Share — $19,000 · Arts & CultureNW GOLDBERG CARES INC — $12,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $7,614 · Arts & CultureDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $232,775 · EducationDETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION — $10,716 · EducationTHE MICHIGAN HISPANIC COLLABORATIVE — $10,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $193,679 · Youth Development
Other$4,394,082Community Improvement$656,310Recreation & Sports$439,811Health$329,793Arts & Culture$283,489Education$253,491Youth Development$193,679

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWAYNE COUNTY-DETROIT CDE INC — $441,310 over 2y, 56% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $232,775 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $193,679 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $171,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $133,662 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED — $127,025 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $104,375 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARINERS INN — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOLEMAN A YOUNG FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetEASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DETROIT — $100,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetDETROIT EMPLOYMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY PARK IN THE CITY OF DETROIT — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMIGUEL CABRERA FOUNDATION INC — $95,262 over 3y, 44% of budgetLITTLE CAESARS AAA HOCKEY CLUB — $67,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $61,966 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMotor City Veterans Hockey Association — $59,959 over 3y, 49% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $44,010 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN SPORTS HALL OF FAME — $40,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $34,075 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR GIRLS — $30,906 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE MICHIGAN — $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSAY DETROIT — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKultureCity — $24,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEAST SIDE YOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCLARK PARK COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetJACK'S PLACE FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAngels Share — $19,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAFFIRMATIONS COMMUNITY CENTER — $18,296 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $16,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES HUMPHREY KEATING IV FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNFX — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE — $13,192 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKINGDOM HOME — $12,750 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNW GOLDBERG CARES INC — $12,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION — $10,716 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KANSAS CITY ROYALS FOUNDATION — $10,113 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN HISPANIC COLLABORATIVE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnchoRRa — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCalvin Johnson Jr Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan — $9,388 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC — $8,818 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER — $8,580 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREE MOM HUGS INC — $7,614 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER — $7,270 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $6,665 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dte Energy FoundationMI37.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dte Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Ford Philanthropy · The Skillman Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Ethel and James Flinn Foundation · Hudson-Webber Foundation · Ally Charitable Foundation · Gilbert Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ilitch Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Miguel Cabrera Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ilitch Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ilitch Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph