Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Eagles Autism Challenge Inc

The mission of the eagles autism foundation is to support the highest quality and most impactful autism research and care to improve the lives of affected individuals and families now, as well as foster the acquisition of knowledge, technologies, and discoveries that will bring new opportunities in the future.

$8.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$28MEmployment$1.0MHuman Services$7k
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 39 grants below total $6,829,734 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,087,234 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,257,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $530k
  • $250k+13 grants · $6.3M
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$1,168,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$800,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$425,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$400,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$400,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$400,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$400,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$400,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$400,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$400,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$400,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$400,000
AJ DREXEL AUTISM INSITITUTE$300,000
COMPREHENSIVE LEARNING CENTER$25,000
A STEP UP ACADEMY$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOODS SERVICES INC: $6k → 6%CARSON WENTZ A01 FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $25k → 14%KULTURECITY: $25k → 16%BANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $25k → 12%THE ELWYN FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%KENS KREW INC: $10k → 17%KULTURE CITY: $10k → 16%RAISE THE BAR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 12%KEN'S KREW INC: $18k → 6%ELWYN FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%KENCREST: $8k → 7%KEN'S KIDS INC: $25k → 7%INTERCOMMUNITY ACTION: $25k → 22%EMPOWERU SPECIALTY FITNESS: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MO
DE
AZ
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $1.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$800k · 64% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: AUTISM RESEARCH

South America$450k · 36% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: AUTISM RESEARCH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14M · 22 repeat orgs$10.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
27

Total granted

$14M
$6.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+4%

Still filing today

82%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +59%
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +7%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    3× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $937k · revenue +126%
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $809k · revenue +65%
  • UO
    University of Wisconsin Madison
    one grant, 2024 · $800k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
2
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
3
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
4
The Children's Institute Parent Company

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
5
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
8
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
9
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Autism and the most unlike its peers is The Institute for Behavior Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsDevelopmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%66%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/75
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,490

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/60
Grantees still filing
33/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER — $1,200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CEN…State University of Iowa — $1,200,000 · OtherState University of IowaUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $1,200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAP…University of Wisconsin Madison — $800,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $800,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $425,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $400,000 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS — $400,000 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $400,000 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL (DBA PROJECT GRACE GUILD) — $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $400,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH — $400,000 · Other+10 more — $340,719 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $4,863,015 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADE…Children's Hospital Corporation — $1,200,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $936,829 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADE…THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $808,939 · HealthTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPIT…THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $400,000 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $400,000 · Health+8 more — $197,380 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,418,975 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PEN…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $1,851,895 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYEmory University — $800,000 · EducationEmory UniversityPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $400,000 · EducationHebrew University of Jerusalem — $400,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $400,000 · EducationYale University — $400,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $400,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · Education+8 more — $482,573 · Education+8 moreLet's Work for Good Inc — $1,000,000 · EmploymentNEURODIVERSITY AT WORK INC — $42,579 · Employment+2 more — $45,000 · EmploymentBROWN UNIVERSITY — $800,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ELWYN FOUNDATION — $56,520 · Human ServicesKEN'S KREW — $53,150 · Human ServicesKultureCity — $35,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesBANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesINTERCOMMUNITY ACTION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesEmpowerU Specialty Fitness Inc — $25,000 · Human Services+4 more — $26,725 · Human ServicesVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF THE DELAWARE VALLEY — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsJOE HAND BOXING GYM INC — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSpecial Equestrians Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$9,165,719Health$8,806,163Education$8,353,443Employment$1,087,579Community Improvement$800,000Human Services$271,395Recreation & Sports$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $4,863,015 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,418,975 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $1,851,895 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $1,200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLet's Work for Good Inc — $1,000,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $936,829 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $808,939 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $800,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew University of Jerusalem — $400,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $400,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $127,839 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF THE DELAWARE VALLEY — $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $97,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetA STEP UP ACADEMY INC — $90,234 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY FORGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELWYN FOUNDATION — $56,520 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKEN'S KREW — $53,150 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CENTER AT HAMPTON HOUSE — $49,880 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetNEURODIVERSITY AT WORK INC — $42,579 over 2y, 18% of budgetCOMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PATHWAY SCHOOL — $39,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKultureCity — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHEATRE HORIZON INC — $32,230 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES AT HR EDMUNDS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF SOUTHEASTERN PA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBANCROFT A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Autism — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRed Clay Education Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetPRECISION INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINTERCOMMUNITY ACTION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHORE MEDICAL CENTER-MEDICAL STAFF — $20,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetGOLDEY-BEACOM COLLEGE — $19,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALUS UNIVERSITY — $15,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACEING AUTISM INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISM REC — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE ARC ALLIANCE ADVOCACY SERVICES — $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpecial Equestrians Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKENCREST SERVICES — $8,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Charitable FoundationME22.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Child Development Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Kistler Tiffany Foundation · The Arcadia Foundation · Foundations Community Partnership · The Wawa Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eagles Autism Challenge Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Goldey-Beacom College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eagles Autism Challenge Inc?

Find your warmest path to Eagles Autism Challenge Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph