Skip to content

Washington · Private foundation

Mani Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2021
12
Grants FY2021
12
Organizations funded FY2021
25%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Mani Charitable Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Mani Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $105k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
13
’18
9
’19
20
’20
9
’21
5
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 21
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
5
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 25% of the organizations Mani Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 27% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202112$105k25%
FY202021$97k52%
FY201910$53k20%
FY201814$98k71%
FY201711$68kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$2.0MEducation$180kHuman Services$66kHousing & Shelter$65kCrime & Legal$59kInternational$28kArts & Culture$15kHealth$8kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chapman University$90,00040%
Api Chaya$58,71041%
Indian American Community Services$34,23551%
Building Changes$32,50030%
The Sophia Way$30,75040%
Bellevue Schools Foundation$25,03050%
Upaya Social Ventures$21,40841%
University Preparatory Academy$17,22630%
Pratham USA$11,13640%
Maris Place$8,00014%
Show all 33 grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($63k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mani Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChapman University: $90,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetApi Chaya: $58,710 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetIndian American Community Services: $34,235 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBuilding Changes: $32,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Sophia Way: $30,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBellevue Schools Foundation: $25,030 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUpaya Social Ventures: $21,408 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity Preparatory Academy: $17,226 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPratham USA: $11,136 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMaris Place: $8,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetAsha for Education: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Eastside: $2,686 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHopelink: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOverlake Service League: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCovenant House: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTreehouse: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $1,123 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHedgebrook: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssociation for Indias Development Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSai Parivar Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKing County Sexual Assault Resource Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSocial and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKiran Anjali Project: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPratidhwani: $500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCross Out Cancer: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMotley Zoo Animal Rescue: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGive One Dollar a Day: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 31.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA24.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Salesforce Foundation · Aven Foundation · Satya and Rao Remala Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Akila and S Somasegar Family Foundation · Naveen and Anu Jain Family Foundation · Overlake Medical Center & Clinics

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mani Charitable Foundation with peer funders

About Mani Charitable Foundation

How much does Mani Charitable Foundation give?
Mani Charitable Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $105,141 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 21 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Mani Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (82%), Education (7%), Human Services (3%).
Who are Mani Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Chapman University ($90k), Api Chaya ($59k), Indian American Community Services ($34k).
Does Mani Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mani Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mani Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seattle Foundation, Puget Sound Energy Foundation, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc.
Where is Mani Charitable Foundation based?
Mani Charitable Foundation is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mani’s filings →

More from the funding graph