Loading…
Loading…
Kansas · Nonprofit
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF (Kansas) is funded by 34 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $32,421,177 in grants to it, the largest being THEATER LEAGUE INC ($20,191,882). 18 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 695 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 695 philanthropy nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
95% of JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (82% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $2.2M → $8.0M on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
14 of 34 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 34 funders by total. Association, not causation.
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 90% · 2018 39% · 2019 45% · 2020 28% · 2021 60% · 2022 88% · 2023 78% · 2024 94% · 2025 99% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
10% of JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF draws 66% of its grant income from funders outside Kansas — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 13 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 34 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
95% of spending goes to programs.
92%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Part of a family of 10 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 34funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing