Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gerson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$628kArts & Culture$117kReligion$97kHealth$75kEducation$59kHuman Services$46kCivil Rights$28kEmployment$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF KANSAS CITY$60,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KC$31,000
CHABAD OF KU$12,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU$7,500
KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY$7,500
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
POLLY LABS$5,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEM$5,000
NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION$5,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$4,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$3,000
TEMPLE B'NAI JEHUDAH$2,700
GREAT JOBS KANSAS CITY$2,500
THE FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM$2,500
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $250 → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 5%HANDS TO HEART: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
KS
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$718k · 37 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
21

Total granted

$718k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+7%

Still filing today

59%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $71k · revenue +23%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +21%
  • TN
    THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEMS ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • OM
    OLATHE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +192%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

2
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
3
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
4
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
6
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
7
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

9
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity Arts CentersImmigrant Worker SupportPublic Library OperationsEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%5%<5yr11%8%5–10yr16%16%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr25%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%4%<5yr11%3%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr25%62%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
9%
1,530/17,480

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
27/39
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF KANSAS CITY — $286,734 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF KANSAS CITYKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT — $40,141 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTCHABAD OF KU — $32,000 · OtherCHABAD OF KUUNIVERSITY OF KS HEALTH SYSTEMS ENDOWMENT — $29,733 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KS HEALTH SYSTEMS ENDOWMENTTEMPLE BNAI JEHUDAH — $24,168 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HEALTH SYSTEMS ENDOWMENT — $20,407 · Other+34 more — $115,951 · Other+34 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $192,482 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSA…JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $148,343 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GRE…KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $70,503 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY…THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $29,382 · Arts & CultureTHE NELSON …KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $8,050 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CE…+3 more — $2,250 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $42,604 · Human Services+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesGREAT JOBS KC INC — $17,429 · EducationUNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $6,000 · EducationWilliam Jewell College — $2,597 · EducationHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY — $2,500 · EducationREDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $2,081 · Education+1 more — $250 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $2,500 · Civil RightsHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $8,000 · Food & NutritionKANBE'S MARKETS — $2,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,550 · Food & NutritionMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $1,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $300 · Food & Nutrition
Other$549,134Philanthropy$340,825Arts & Culture$110,185Human Services$45,104Education$38,357Civil Rights$27,500Food & Nutrition$13,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $192,482 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $148,343 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $70,503 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $42,604 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $29,382 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT JOBS KC INC — $17,429 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $9,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $8,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Commons Project Foundation — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Jewell College — $2,597 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKANBE'S MARKETS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA JEWISH SPORTS HALL OF FAME — $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWHOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLARKSPUR LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREAT JOBS KC INC
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds The Commons Project Foundation
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds William Jewell College
  • Who funds HYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC
  • Who funds KANBE'S MARKETS
  • Who funds REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marion and Henry Bloch Family FoundationMO34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Patricia Werthan Uhlmann Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation · Kathleen L and Michael J Rainen Family Foundation C/O Friend & Associates LLC · Saint Lukes Health System Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gerson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gerson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gerson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph