Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation

The organization is designed to provide support for other charitable organizations as described in section 501(c)(3) and sections 509(a) of the internal revenue code.

$518k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$250k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Greater Kansas City, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $518k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
8
18
11
19
0
20
0
22
3
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$7.3MHealth$548kHuman Services$395kArts & Culture$188kReligion$100kYouth Development$73kEducation$60kInternational$45kOther$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Village Shalom Inc$250,000
Kansas City Ballet$100,000
Kemper Museum of Contemporary Art$72,500
Mayo Clinic$25,000
Operation Breakthrough$25,000
Harry S Truman Library Institute$15,000
Jewish Community Center$10,000
Village Shalom Inc$10,000
Planned Parenthood of the Great Plains$5,000
Unicorn Theatre$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $295k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Jewish Family Services: $15k → 5%Jewish Family Services: $10k → 5%Village Shalom Inc: $250k → 5%Village Shalom Inc: $10k → 5%Village Shalom Inc: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 49% of Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in KS; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$590k · 7 repeat orgs$833k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2018, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$590k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VS
    VILLAGE SHALOM INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $270k · revenue +49%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
    3× · 2018–2023 · $133k · revenue +63%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $110k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +105%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE UMKC CONSERVATORY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +8%
  • KC
    KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
University of Kansas Memorial Corporation

The memorial unions function as a concessionaire to the university of kansas for the purpose of operating various enterprises within the kansas union building, the burge union, the debruce center, residential dining halls, and other…

Education
3
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

4
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
5
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
6
The Kansas University Alumni Association

We build lifelong relationships that strengthen the university of kansas and the legacy of excellence embodied by its students, alumni, faculty, staff and friends.

Education
7
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

8
Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation

To conduct and support activities for the benefit of the jewish federation of omaha.

Philanthropy
9
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education
10
Kansas City Art Institute

The mission of KCAI is to educate artists and designers while honoring the distinct journeys of students. We forge a vibrant community that equips them to become leaders who leverage the creative process to transform the future.

Education
11
Colorado Symphony Association

The colorado symphony association (csa) is a not-for-profit organization established to fund and operate the colorado symphony orchestra for the enjoyment and benefit of the citizens of metropolitan denver and (cont'd on schedule…

Arts & Culture
12
Kentucky Bankers Association

To provide effective advocacy for the financial services industry both in kentucky and on a national level; to serve as a reliable and responsive source of information and education about areas of interest to the industry; and to provide a…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City and the most unlike its peers is The Harry S Truman Library Institute National and International Affairs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr13%0%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr25%52%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr13%0%5–10yr16%0%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr12%1%35–55yr25%94%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
1,081/8,400

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $6,720,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITYJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $553,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY+1 more — $132,500 · PhilanthropySaint Lukes Foundation — $500,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $25,000 · Health+2 more — $22,500 · HealthVILLAGE SHALOM INC — $270,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $25,000 · Human ServicesKANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION — $110,000 · Arts & CultureKEMPER MUSEUM OPERATING FOUNDATION — $72,500 · Arts & CultureUNICORN THEATRE — $15,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $15,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE UMKC CONSERVATORY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY FRIENDS OF ALVIN AILEY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCongregation Beth Shalom — $100,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY — $20,000 · OtherTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS — $25,000 · EducationOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $25,000 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $25,000 · EducationHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY — $10,000 · EducationSEVENDAYS INC — $10,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$7,405,500Health$547,500Human Services$295,000Arts & Culture$257,500Other$120,000Education$85,000Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $6,720,000 over 5y, 37% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $553,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSaint Lukes Foundation — $500,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetVILLAGE SHALOM INC — $270,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $132,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION — $110,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKEMPER MUSEUM OPERATING FOUNDATION — $72,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNICORN THEATRE — $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY REPERTORY THEATRE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY FRIENDS OF ALVIN AILEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSEVENDAYS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic FundKS28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Nerman Family Foundation · Copaken Family Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Lowenstein Family Supporting Foundation · Abe & Anna Bograd Memorial Trust 10030800 · Arvin Gottlieb Charitable Foundation 10015600 · Richard J Stern Foundation for the Arts Commerce Bank Trustee · Enid and Crosby Kemper Foundation 10018904

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stanley J Bushman Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph