Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

White Family Supporting Foundation

The organization is designed to provide support for other charitable organizations, as described in sections 501(c) and 509(a) of the internal revenue code.

$293k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$418kPhilanthropy$306kCommunity Improvement$105kHealth$95kReligion$89kCivil Rights$53kEducation$53kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $273,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $293,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $264k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$36,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS)$25,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS)$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$20,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE - KANSAS CITY$20,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS)$20,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS)$18,000
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HILLEL FOUNDATION$15,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$10,000
HYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY$10,000
CONGREGATION KOL AMI$10,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $455k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $48k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $25k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $20k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $18k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $18k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $18k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $18k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $18k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $16k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES (JFS): $15k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $15k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $12k → 5%Jewish Community Campus: $10k → 5%Jewish Family Services (JFS): $8k → 5%Jewish Family Services: $20k → 5%Jewish Family Services: $15k → 5%Jewish Family Services: $12k → 5%Village Shalom Inc: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$797k · 9 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$797k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+42%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $435k · revenue +86%
  • JV
    JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $103k · revenue +207%
  • NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EPSTEN GALLERY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue -50%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • VS
    VILLAGE SHALOM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Kansas Jewish Federation Inc

Build, strengthen, and preserve jewish identity within the local community, in israel, and around the world through tzedakah, education, and cultural events.

Religion
2
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
3
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
Jewish Community Centers Association of North America

Jcc association strengthens jewish life in north america through direct service to affiliate jccs, ym-ywha's and camps and by providing leadership and guidance to the jcc movement. in addition, we serve jewish personnel in the armed forces…

Human Services
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
8
Jewish Community Relations Council

The jewish community relations council (jcrc) works within the jewish and broader communities in st. louis to enhance cooperation with other religious, racial, ethnic and civic groups; foster a just, democratic and pluralistic society; and…

Community Improvement
9
Jewish Community Center of Nashville

The gordon jewish community center welcomes all, builds community, and provides excellent programs rooted in jewish values to enrich the mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation of Omaha Inc

To build and sustain a strong and vibrant omaha jewish community and to support jews in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
12
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City and the most unlike its peers is The Epsten Gallery Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $435,010 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES+2 more — $20,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $221,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS…JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $135,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREA…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $28,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER …JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY — $103,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SE…Congregation Beth Shalom — $60,000 · OtherCongregation Beth Sh…CONGREGATION KOL AMI INC — $20,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KOL AMI…THE EPSTEN GALLERY FOUNDATION — $18,000 · OtherTHE EPSTEN GALLERY F…HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $15,000 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATIO…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED — $70,000 · Community ImprovementAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $21,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC — $42,000 · Civil RightsHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY — $17,500 · EducationNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$455,010Philanthropy$384,000Other$216,000Community Improvement$91,000Civil Rights$42,000Education$17,500Arts & Culture$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $435,010 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $221,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $135,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU OF KANSAS CITY — $103,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED — $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUREAU INC — $42,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EPSTEN GALLERY FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetHYMAN BRAND HEBREW ACADEMY — $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $15,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS OF GREATER KANSAS CITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLAGE SHALOM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $8,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas CityKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization White Family Supporting Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to White Family Supporting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to White Family Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph