· Private foundation
Stephen G and Susan E Denkers Family Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of Stephen G and Susan E Denkers Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k14 grants · $64k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $262k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Children's Center | $60,000 |
| Moran Eye Center | $50,000 |
| YCC Family Crisis Center | $25,000 |
| Westminster College | $25,000 |
| University of Utah Orthopedic Cente | $25,000 |
| Henry's Fork Foundation | $22,000 |
| Planned Parenthood | $15,000 |
| PBS | $15,000 |
| Salt Lake City Bicycle Collective | $15,000 |
| Summit Land Conservancy | $10,000 |
| Fourth Street Clinic | $10,000 |
| Utah Film Center | $10,000 |
| Greater Yellowstone Coalition | $10,000 |
| Prospekt Mira | $10,000 |
| Crossroads Urban Center | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YFYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER2× · 2021–2022 · $85k · revenue +14%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH2× · 2021–2022 · $65k · revenue +92%
- HFHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $27k · revenue +146%
Funded once
- TFTrails Foundationone grant, 2021 · $30k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF UTAHone grant, 2021 · $25k
- GOGREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTRgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
Utah Open Lands' mission is to preserve and protect open space, in perpetuity, in order to maintain Utah's natural heritage and quality of life for present and future generations. The purpose of Utah Open Lands is to permanently protect…
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
Improve utah's wetlands through hands-on conservation and community engagement
The Utah State Fair Corporation was established to preserve Utah's heritage, meet tomorrow's future today, and showcase agriculture and innovative technology.
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Clean Energy Alliance Inc and the most unlike its peers is Prospekt Mira. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE CITY BICYCLE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds GREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS ↗
- Who funds Crossroads Urban Center ↗
- Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY ↗
- Who funds Craft Lake City Corporation ↗
- Who funds ECCLES COMMUNITY ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds Summit Land Conservancy ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake ↗
- Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Public Media ↗
- Who funds UTAH WETLANDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals ↗
- Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PROSPEKT MIRA ↗
- Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Hemingway Foundation · Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark · Palladium Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Castle Foundation Co Greg Phillips
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stephen G and Susan E Denkers Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stephen G and Susan E Denkers Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Stephen G and Susan E Denkers Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.