Loading…
Loading…
Oklahoma · Nonprofit
INTEGRIS SO OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPCORP (Oklahoma) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $25,153,639 in grants to it, the largest being INTEGRIS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER INC ($20,339,383). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INTEGRIS SO OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPCORP is better cushioned than half of the 1,976 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,976 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
1% of INTEGRIS SO OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPCORP’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$3.9M from 2 funders in 2023, up from $5.0M and 3 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of INTEGRIS SO OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPCORP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
INTEGRIS SO OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPCORP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 54% · 2019 58% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 90% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
INTEGRIS SO OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPCORP is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Oklahoma funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $42k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
82% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 17 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing