Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Helping women now by providing help and inspiring hope to those affected by breast cancer through early detection, education, and support services.

$9.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
95
Grants FY2025still arriving
51
States reached
$377k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$32MInternational$266kPhilanthropy$145kEducation$81k
02FY2025 · 95 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 95 grants below total $6,718,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,777,573 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,059,573 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $958k
  • $50k–250k51 grants · $5.0M
  • $250k+2 grants · $695k
$50,000
Median grant
51
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Parkland Health Foundation$377,000
Forge Breast Cancer Survivor$318,000
UT Southwestern Medical Cente$214,600
ADVENTIST HEALTH WHITE MEMORI$200,000
Baptist Health Foundation$198,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Canc$186,000
University of Louisville Heal$175,000
Johns Hopkins$173,000
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute$170,000
Gloria Gemma Breast Cancer Re$149,500
Radiant Healing Together$145,400
American-Italian Cancer Found$131,000
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$125,600
Methodist Health System Found$125,000
NewYork-Presbyterian$119,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center: $100k → 11%Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative LLC: $10k → 10%St Josephs Hospital and Medi: $75k → 11%St Joseph's Womens Health Services Center: $50k → 11%St Joseph's Womens Health Services Center: $15k → 11%St Joseph's Womens Health Services Center: $10k → 11%St Joseph's Womens Health Services Center: $10k → 11%ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER: $115k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$28M · 97 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

97 repeat relationships — 67 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
25

Total granted

$28M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+6%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PARKLAND FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +7%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +64%
  • WM
    White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Miami
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue +9%
  • RH
    Radiant Healing Together
    one grant, 2024 · $119k
  • H
    Health-Sync
    one grant, 2024 · $105k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
2
Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists Pllc

The Mission of Hartford HealthCare Medical Group Specialists, PLLC is to put the patients first, provide coordinated quality care and value, exceed the expectations of patients, providers, staff and the community that it serves.

Health
3
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
University Medical Center Inc

To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.

Health
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association

Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Via Christi Hospitals Wichita Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Miami. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/149
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,416

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
115/121
Grantees still filing
84/121
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PARKLAND FOUNDATION — $2,940,500 · HealthPARKLAND FOUNDATIONWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $1,330,789 · HealthWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memo…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $741,600 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $734,295 · Health+87 more — $13,640,042 · Health+87 moreUTMD ANDERSON — $1,212,700 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $774,844 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SO…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $753,492 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RES…Swedish Covenant Health — $621,703 · OtherSwedish Covenant HealthRalph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention — $504,218 · OtherRalph Lauren Center for Ca…Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc — $465,032 · OtherDallas Methodist Hospitals…CARRIE TINGLEY HOSPITAL — $321,893 · OtherMississippi State Department of Health — $305,000 · Other+33 more — $2,650,100 · Other+33 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,389,540 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $604,716 · EducationUniversity of Miami — $175,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $147,652 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $96,000 · Education+3 more — $125,665 · EducationCONVOY OF HOPE — $1,741,812 · InternationalJPS FOUNDATION — $352,175 · PhilanthropyASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $180,013 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $145,400 · PhilanthropyWELLSTAR FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $40,030 · PhilanthropyST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION — $375,155 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesACADEMY OF ONCOLOGY NURSE NAVIGATORSINC — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Health$19,387,226Other$7,608,982Education$2,538,573International$1,741,812Philanthropy$792,618Human Services$385,155Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARKLAND FOUNDATION — $2,940,500 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $1,741,812 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,389,540 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn — $1,330,789 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $753,492 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $741,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $734,295 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Inc — $628,130 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetSwedish Covenant Health — $621,703 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $616,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $610,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $604,716 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION — $593,500 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetMCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION — $528,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetRalph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention — $504,218 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFORGE SURVIVORSHIP CENTER — $488,025 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetDallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc — $465,032 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION — $421,927 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $403,990 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center — $403,794 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN — $399,224 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION — $375,155 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetBREAST AND GYN HEALTH PROJECT — $359,495 over 8y, 17% of budgetJPS FOUNDATION — $352,175 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetDELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC — $348,750 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $341,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $305,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGLORIA GEMMA BREAST CANCER RESOURCE FOUNDATION — $302,803 over 2y, 10% of budgetLUCY WEBB HAYES NATIONAL TRAINING SCHOOL FOR DEACONESSES & MISSIONARIES — $292,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY — $253,490 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $246,206 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBon Secours St Francis Health System Inc — $214,953 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation — $213,679 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetARKANSAS CANCER COALITION — $200,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $197,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $195,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $194,899 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE BREAST NETWORK INC — $194,200 over 5y, 13% of budgetNEVADA HEALTH CENTERS INC — $188,704 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $180,013 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE ROSE — $175,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ALPHONSUS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC — $174,888 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $161,114 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS — $158,195 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSVMC Holdings Inc — $157,629 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nebraska Medical Center — $155,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOY TO LIFE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds White Memorial Med Cntr Charitable Fdtn Adventist Health White Memorial Ch Fdtn ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Swedish Covenant Health ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN-ITALIAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCLAREN FLINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care and Prevention ↗
  • Who funds FORGE SURVIVORSHIP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center ↗
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BREAST AND GYN HEALTH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds JPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE BREAST CANCER COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLORIA GEMMA BREAST CANCER RESOURCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUCY WEBB HAYES NATIONAL TRAINING SCHOOL FOR DEACONESSES & MISSIONARIES ↗
  • Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds THE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL IOWA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Bon Secours St Francis Health System Inc ↗
  • Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN MONCRIEF CANCER CENTER MONCRIEF CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CANCER COALITION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…American Heart Associ…Reach Out and Read IncWill Rogers Motion Pi…Child's PlayCystic Fibrosis Found…Amyotrophic Lateral S…Vanderbilt University…Parkinson's Foundatio…Direct ReliefPublic Health Institu…Mayo Clinic
American Cancer Society IncGA70.4× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Will Rogers Motion Picture Pioneers Foundation · Child's Play · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Parkinson's Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Public Health Institute · Mayo Clinic

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Breast Cancer Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Delaware Breast Cancer Coalition Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Bayhealth Foundation Corporation — 4% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Memorial Hospital — 1% of income from government
  • Svmc Holdings Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Central Vermont Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Portland Adventist Medical Center — 0% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Orlando Health Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
28report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home