How much did SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH grant in FY2024?

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH reported 4 grants totaling $853,535 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH based?

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH is based in CO.

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH

We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of the people (see schedule o) and communities we serve, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$854k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$500k

Largest

01What you fund

0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$60MHuman Services$35kArts & Culture$22kEnvironment$20kEducation$10kOther$6.9M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

healthcare

2020

—

2021

artmuseum

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$250k+2 grants · $816k

$315,511

Median grant

States reached

$2.6B

Total assets

Largest grants

MOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC$500,000
CARITAS CLINICS INC$315,511
COLORADO CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY$20,000
CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 12%. 4% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 72% of SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 8% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTHlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$66M · 8 repeat orgs$740k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$66M

$713k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+23%

Still filing today

88%

92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SV
ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE
7× · 2017–2023 · $52M · revenue +43%
MS
MOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +37%
SH
SCL HEALTH - FRONT RANGE INC
2× · 2017–2022 · $258k · revenue +42%

Funded once

SJ
SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL INC
one grant, 2023 · $454k · revenue +13%
SV
ST VINCENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +117%
WF
WOMENS FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +146%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Colorado West Healthcare System

Improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health

Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado

We make the healing presence of God known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health

Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health

Catholic Medical Center

The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.

Health

St Joseph Hospital

Healthcare services to anyone needing care.

Health

Stanford Health Care

Health

Medical Center of the Rockies

We improve lives through learning, healing, discovery, and through human connection.

Health

Intermountain Healthcare

Provide strategic and fiduciary leadership for philanthropic endeavors of ihc health services, inc.

Health

Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health

Renown Health

To establish, equip and maintain one or more general acute care hospitals and medical centers.

Health

Saint Thomas Health

Coordinates the management of a non-profit hospital and healthcare delivery system to improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.

Health

Saint Joseph Regional Medical

To provide health care system management and support

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scl Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/25

the rest of the field

715/9,947

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

21/22

Grantees still filing

17/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$59,731,327Other$6,909,875Human Services$35,000Arts & Culture$21,667Environment$20,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scl Health FoundationCO16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scl Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · St Mary's Hospital & Medical · Rose Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CARITAS CLINICS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 481009910 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CARITAS CLINICS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 81% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health?

Find your warmest path to Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health?

More from the funding graph

SISTERS OF CHARITY OF LEAVENWORTH HEALTH

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health?

More from the funding graph