Loading…
· Private foundation
ARIZONA HEALTHIEST STATE FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$303k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$303k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Health$316kPhilanthropy$1kHuman Services$781Other$85k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
ppe healthcarehealthcare workersworkers covidcovid outbreak
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$302,767
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$302,767
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $781) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation
Improving health, healing people.
Health
2
Marana Health Center Inc
Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.
Health
3
Honorhealth
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
Health
4
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Health
5
Banner Medical Group
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Health
6
Pinnacle Health Medical Services
Pinnacle health medical services provides primary care, clinic and specialty physician services.
Health
7
Canyonlands Community Health Center
The mission of canyonlands healthcare is to promote healthier lives through affordable, accessible, integrated primary care.
—
8
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin
The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with the compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.
Health
9
Yuma Regional Medical Center
Through prudent use of resources, our 406-bed inpatient hospital, along with numerous outpatient clinics, serves as the healthcare hub for all of yuma county.
Health
10
Tmc Health Foundation
The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.
Health
11
Tmc Healthcare
Aspire to serve our community by being the best health system as measured by the quality of care we deliver, the experiences we create and the value we bring.
Health
12
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Flagstaff Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Covenant Health Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 95% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
14%
3,376/24,834
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
24 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$316,050Other$85,155Philanthropy$1,281Human Services$781
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLE DEL SOL ↗
- Who funds THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WINSLOW INDIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUN LIFE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUNSET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds DESERT SENITA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Arizona Community FoundationAZ30.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Arizona · The Foundation for Community and Health · American Cancer Society Inc · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Direct Relief · Arizona Hospital & Healthcare · Mercy Care · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ARIZONA HEALTHIEST STATE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 863255998 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 46% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Arizona Healthiest State Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Arizona Healthiest State Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines