Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care Corp

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$7.6MPhilanthropy$108kCommunity Improvement$100kPublic Benefit$25kArts & Culture$23k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $249k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$295M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED$149,310
GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER$100,000
FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION$12,500
MARCH OF DIMES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $304k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $149k → 16%Health Alliance For the Uninsured: $142k → 16%FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 3 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$7.6M
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $7.3M · revenue +55%
  • Health Alliance for the Uninsured
    2× · 2024–2025 · $292k · revenue -18%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $108k · revenue 0%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $51k · revenue +10%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc

The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…

2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

5
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
6
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

7
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

8
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

9
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

10
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

11
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
12
Yuma Regional Medical Center

The purpose of yuma regional medical center is "building a healthier tomorrow." we are guided by three pillars: (1) putting patients first; (2) rooted in the community and; (3) committed to progress.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc — $7,263,667 · HealthINTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc+3 more — $80,500 · HealthHealth Alliance for the Uninsured — $291,510 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $12,500 · Human ServicesGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $100,000 · OtherOklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc — $25,265 · OtherUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc — $107,750 · PhilanthropyALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$7,344,167Human Services$304,010Other$125,265Philanthropy$107,750Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTEGRIS So Oklahoma City Hosp Corp dba INTEGRIS Southwest Medical Center I nc — $7,263,667 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHealth Alliance for the Uninsured — $291,510 over 2y, 11% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc — $107,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc — $25,265 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center IncOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center Inc · Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City · INTEGRIS Health INC · Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization INTEGRIS Ambulatory Care Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • First Americans Museum Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph