Loading…
Loading…
Oklahoma · Nonprofit
INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC (Oklahoma) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $35,613,914 in grants to it, the largest being INTEGRIS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ($24,159,698). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC has grown faster than half of the 1,976 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,976 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
1% of INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$1.2M from 2 funders in 2023, up from $13M and 3 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 68% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 52% · 2019 94% · 2020 92% · 2021 65% · 2022 62% · 2023 99% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Oklahoma funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $13k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
82% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 18 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing