Loading…
· Public charity
INTEGRIS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
The foundation promotes the philanthropic support and mission of integris health, inc.
$3.9M
Granted FY2023
6
Grants
1
Communities
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Health$33MEducation$88k
02FY2023 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $48k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.1M
$389,522
Median grant
1
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
- INTEGRIS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER INC$1,939,136
- INTEGRIS RURAL HEALTH INC$484,543
- INTEGRIS SOUTH OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPITAL CORP$389,522
- INTEGRIS HEALTH INC$262,647
- INTEGRIS AMBULATORY CARE CORPORATION$47,648
- INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC$8,698
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 15%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$33M · 7 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
7
1
Total granted
$33M
$15k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+41%
+16%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IHINTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC6× · 2018–2023 · $24M · revenue +59%
- IBINTEGRIS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER INC6× · 2018–2023 · $4.5M · revenue +41%
- IHINTEGRIS HEALTH INC6× · 2018–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +57%
Funded once
- IHINTEGRIS HOSPICE INC2× · 2018–2021 · $15k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Integrated Health Corporation
Health
2
Intermountain Healthcare
Provide strategic and fiduciary leadership for philanthropic endeavors of ihc health services, inc.
Health
3
Infirmary Health System Inc
The infirmary health system mission is life which means emphasis is placed on leadership, integrity, family and excellent service. our vision is that we are the first choice for healthcare in our region. throughout infirmary heatlh system…
Health
4
Innovis Health Llc
We are called to make a healthy difference in people's lives.
Health
5
Inland Hospital
Inland Hospital d/b/a Northern Light Inland Hospital operates a 48-bed non-profit hospital and outlying clinics in the Waterville area, that provides medical, surgical, and acute care to all, regardless of ability to pay.
Health
6
Ascension Health-Is Inc
Information technology support organization for nonprofit, spiritually-centered healthcare system with multiple locations in 19 states and the District of Columbia.
—
7
Adventist Midwest Health
The provision of medical care to the community through the operation of two hospitals.
Health
8
Prisma Health
Inspire health. serve with compassion. be the difference.
Health
9
Prisma Health-Midlands
Inspire health. serve with compassion. be the difference.
Health
10
Unity Healthcare
Improve the health of the people and communities we serve.
Health
11
The Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Ingalls memorial hospital is a nonprofit acute care hospital organized for the purpose of providing patient care, education, and research.
Health
12
Genesys Ambulatory Health Services
To improve the health and well-being of all people in the communities we serve.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Integris So Oklahoma City Hospcorp and the most unlike its peers is Western Village Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2023.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$32,864,946Education$87,542
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS RURAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS AMBULATORY CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS SOUTH OKLAHOMA CITY HOSPITAL CORP ↗
- Who funds WESTERN VILLAGE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRIS HOSPICE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Integris Baptist Medical Center IncOK13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Integris Baptist Medical Center Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation INTEGRIS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2023
’20’21’22’23
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–23
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +59% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 451027361 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on INTEGRIS HEALTH EDMOND INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Integris Health Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Integris Health Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines