Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Nick DeWolf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2024
16
Organizations funded FY2023
19%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$106,918
Organizations funded a year
2 to 16
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$2.5M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 19% of the organizations Nick DeWolf Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving15$216k0%
FY202316$218k19%
FY202214$266k57%
FY20212$251k50%
FY20204$66k75%
FY20193$92k33%
FY20187$94kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Science & Tech$761kEnvironment$369kArts & Culture$42kEducation$18kFood & Nutrition$7kSocial Science$4kReligion$2kRecreation & Sports$1k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 17 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($75k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Nick DeWolf Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAspen Center for Physics: $695,938 over 7y, 26% of budgetGlobal Warming Mitigation Project: $260,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetAspen Science Center: $65,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetWilderness Workshop: $26,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetNational Museum of Mathematics: $25,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Journalism: $12,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetThe Evergreen School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Center for Environmental Studies: $6,790 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEcoflight: $5,003 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Bush School: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlen Canyon Institute: $4,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetThe Aspen Institute Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHigh Country News: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Rocky Mountain School Inc: $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Historical Society: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetProprietors of the Boston Athenaeum: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCompass for Lifelong Discovery: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community FoundationCO21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Arches Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Ruth a Carver Foundation · John & Jacolyn Bucksbaum Family Found · Alpenglow Foundation · Brady Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Seattle Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Nick DeWolf Foundation with peer funders

About Nick DeWolf Foundation

How much does Nick DeWolf Foundation give?
Nick DeWolf Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $215,918 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Nick DeWolf Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (63%), Environment (31%), Arts & Culture (3%).
Who are Nick DeWolf Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Aspen Center for Physics ($696k), Global Warming Mitigation Project ($260k), Aspen Science Center ($65k).
Does Nick DeWolf Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Nick DeWolf Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Nick DeWolf Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Aspen Community Foundation, Aspen Business Center Foundation, Arches Foundation.
Where is Nick DeWolf Foundation based?
Nick DeWolf Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nick DeWolf’s filings →

More from the funding graph