Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Levine Family Foundation Fka Michael & Carol Levine Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$85kFood & Nutrition$40kPhilanthropy$35kHousing & Shelter$20kEmployment$15kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$55,000
NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC$15,000
PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION$15,000
OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND$5,000
ANTHONY CHABOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,000
OAKLAND TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOCIALGOOD FUND INC: $20k → 9%OAKLAND COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $10k → 10%DANCERS GROUP: $5k → 10%NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $20k → 13%WORLD CENTRAL KITHCHEN: $5k → 14%CHABOT PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $5k → 10%NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $15k → 13%OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $5k → 10%NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $15k → 13%ISEEED: $15k → 10%CAMP TREETOPS: $15k → 13%PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $15k → 13%ST MARYS CENTER: $10k → 10%BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 10%TEMPLE SINAI: $5k → 10%MY OTHER BROTHER: $55k → 10%MY OTHER BROTHER: $35k → 10%EAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%OAKLAND TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 10%MY OTHER BROTHER: $20k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20k → 10%ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $15k → 10%ACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN ARM PROJECTS: $5k → 10%ANTHONY CHABOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$210k · 3 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$210k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
-11%

Still filing today

67%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEmploymentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $110k
  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +75%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    2× · 2020–2023 · $35k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • DO
    DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • EO
    EAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Vision

Grounded at the intersection of education, food, and the environment, Common Vision nourishes the transformation of urban landscapes so that healthy communities flourish for generations to come.

Environment
2
Oakland Kids First

The mission of Oakland Kids First is to increase youth voice, leadership and power to create engaging and equitable public schools where all students learn and lead.

Youth Development
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
The East Oakland Collective

The East Oakland Collective supports residents of East Oakland, prioritizing Black residents, to navigate challenges and barriers to inequities through resource distribution and advocacy. We work towards racial and economic justice and…

Community Improvement
5
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
6
Oakland Fund for Public Innovation

The Oakland Fund reaches across the city, engaging private partners to innovate, test and scale ideas that enhance Oakland. The Fund strives to improve the prosperity, safety and quality of life for all Oaklanders with projects that: build…

Community Improvement
7
Alchemist Cdc

Alchemist cdc connects sacramento area communities to land, food, and opportunity toward a vision in which all neighborhoods are vibrant, equitable, healthy, and diverse. we are best known for enhancing the quality of life in…

Community Improvement
8
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
9
Education for Change

To provide a superior public education to oakland's most underserved children by creating a system of public schools that relentlessly focuses on students' academic achievement.

Education
10
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
11
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
12
Foodwise Community

Foodwise grows thriving communities through the power and joy of local food. We envision a world that nourishes all people, local economies, and the living earth.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oakland Public Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Bay Area Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $110,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $65,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INCALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $35,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · OtherST MARY'S CENTER — $10,000 · OtherBay Area Community Services Inc — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $20,000 · Other+4 moreSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $20,000 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $5,000 · EducationDIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) — $15,000 · EmploymentPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyOakland Community Land Trust — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDANCERS GROUP — $5,000 · Arts & CultureACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 · International
Other$275,000Education$25,000Employment$15,000Philanthropy$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Youth Development$5,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) — $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetST MARY'S CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBay Area Community Services Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Community Land Trust — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDANCERS GROUP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTA NON VERBA YOUTH URBAN FARM PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTHONY CHABOT ELEMENTARY PTA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Endowment · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Levine Family Foundation Fka Michael & Carol Levine Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph