Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Funders Network Inc

Tfn's mission is to leverage philanthropy's unique potential to help create communities and regions that are sustainable, prosperous and just for all people.

$871k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$3.7MCommunity Improvement$3.3MEnvironment$3.2MReligion$490kHousing & Shelter$368kHealth$354kFood & Nutrition$290kEmployment$135kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $821k
$60,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF ORLANDO$115,000
FRIENDSHIP HOUSE ASSOCIATION$97,500
ASIAN PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK$90,000
CT ROUNDTABLE ON CLIMATE AND JOBS$83,645
CLIMATE JUSTICE HIVE$73,850
CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY$73,472
VOLUNTEERS IMPROVING NBHD ENVIRON$70,000
GES COALITION$60,000
PINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE$55,000
PROTECT OUR AQUIFER$52,949
WE THE PEOPLE OF DETROIT$50,025
PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS$20,000
COMMUNITY FNDN OF GREATER DUBUQUE$10,000
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK$10,000
NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRON FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $20k → 14%OLD SPOKES HOME: $33k → 10%HEALTHY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 23%WE THE PEOPLE OF DETROIT: $50k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 37 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
65

Total granted

$4.6M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+26%

Still filing today

97%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $704k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $257k · revenue +90%
  • CA
    CANAL ALLIANCE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $210k · revenue +4%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $198k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • HG
    HEALTHY GULF
    one grant, 2024 · $180k · revenue 0%
  • GI
    GREENROOTS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $106k · revenue -22%
  • CC
    Cultivate Charlottesville
    one grant, 2023 · $90k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Green Cities Accord

Green Cities Accord is a nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering climate resilient communities through investments in tree canopy infrastructure to improve environmental health, climate resilience, and equity in communities. We focus…

Environment
2
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
5
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
6
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
7
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
8
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
9
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
Coalition for Green Capital D/B/a American Green Bank Consortium

Cgc operates as a nonprofit financial institution that invests directly and through partners to transform financial markets by using public and private investing to accelerate the deployment of projects that strengthen the grid, reduce…

Environment
12
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communitygiving and the most unlike its peers is The Rosamond Gifford Charitable Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Local Food System Organizat…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersAffordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%16%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/147
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,418

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
128/131
Grantees still filing
99/131
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $352,000 · PhilanthropyMONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $302,900 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUB…Lincoln Community Foundation Inc — $232,500 · PhilanthropyLincoln Community Foundation IncGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $220,770 · PhilanthropyGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUN…DULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Kansas Community Foundation — $199,500 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $194,500 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $188,790 · PhilanthropyFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $170,000 · PhilanthropyWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $164,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $159,500 · PhilanthropyGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyNORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $149,500 · PhilanthropyWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE — $147,180 · PhilanthropyQUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $144,560 · PhilanthropyHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $140,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $139,500 · Philanthropy+15 more — $626,793 · Philanthropy+15 moreCENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY — $198,472 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD T…HEALTHY GULF — $180,000 · EnvironmentHEALTHY GULFBLUE WATER BALTIMORE — $173,125 · EnvironmentBLUE WATER BALTIMORECONNECTICUT ROUNDTABLE ON CLIMATE AND JOBS — $150,000 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT ROUNDTABLE ON…WASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $127,249 · EnvironmentSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD — $126,909 · EnvironmentGroundwork San Diego-Chollas Creek — $120,000 · EnvironmentBETTER BLOCK HAWAII — $115,000 · EnvironmentGREENROOTS INC — $106,450 · EnvironmentColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture — $100,000 · EnvironmentMichigan Saves — $99,252 · Environment+29 more — $1,271,296 · Environment+29 moreIronbound Community Corporation — $173,125 · OtherIronbound Community Corporati…HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY — $173,125 · OtherHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCYALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES — $173,125 · OtherALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKESCITY OF ORLANDO FL — $115,000 · OtherPHILANTHROPIECE FOUNDATION — $196,000 · OtherPHILANTHROPIECE FOUNDATIONVerde Inc — $200,000 · OtherVerde IncNORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $189,500 · OtherNORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATIO…PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $173,125 · OtherPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCYNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $173,125 · OtherNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONCOALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR — $125,000 · Other+39 more — $1,486,287 · Other+39 moreLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $256,711 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITI…INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $230,638 · Community ImprovementINITIATIVE …SOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $189,500 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST I…NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $110,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOO…TAPROOT COLLECTIVE INC — $76,425 · Community ImprovementTAPROOT COL…PHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC — $75,000 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHI…THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $74,959 · Community ImprovementTHE COLORAD…TREESLOUISVILLE INC — $72,000 · Community ImprovementTREESLOUISV…GES COALITION INC — $60,000 · Community ImprovementONE SQUARE WORLD INC — $55,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA COMMUNITY VOICE INC — $45,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $25,000 · Community ImprovementCANAL ALLIANCE — $210,000 · ReligionMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC — $190,000 · ReligionVolunteers Improving Neighborhood Environments Inc — $70,000 · ReligionJerusalem Farm — $20,000 · ReligionPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $173,125 · Housing & ShelterPIEDMONT HOUSING ALLIANCE — $82,500 · Housing & ShelterUNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING COALITION — $70,610 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA AREA INC — $25,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $17,500 · Housing & ShelterNewark Workforce Development Board Inc — $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentCultivate Charlottesville — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentTerra BIRDS — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHANGE CENTER — $23,300 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$3,882,493Environment$2,767,753Other$3,177,412Community Improvement$1,270,233Religion$490,000Housing & Shelter$368,735Youth Development$313,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONTANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $352,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER DUBUQUE — $302,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $256,711 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLincoln Community Foundation Inc — $232,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetINITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $230,638 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $220,770 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $210,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVerde Inc — $200,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetDULUTH-SUPERIOR AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCentral Kansas Community Foundation — $199,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY — $198,472 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPHILANTHROPIECE FOUNDATION — $196,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $194,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC — $190,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $189,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $189,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $188,790 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY GULF — $180,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetIronbound Community Corporation — $173,125 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBLUE WATER BALTIMORE — $173,125 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY — $173,125 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $173,125 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPEOPLE UNITED FOR SUSTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $173,125 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $173,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES — $173,125 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $170,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWALKER AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $164,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $159,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGULF COAST COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT ROUNDTABLE ON CLIMATE AND JOBS — $150,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $149,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INITIATIVE — $147,180 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetQUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $144,560 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING — $140,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $139,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON CONSERVATION ACTION EDUCATION FUND — $127,249 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSEVEN GENERATIONS AHEAD — $126,909 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR — $125,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetGroundwork San Diego-Chollas Creek — $120,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetBETTER BLOCK HAWAII — $115,000 over 2y, 79% of budgetNewark Workforce Development Board Inc — $110,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $110,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGREENROOTS INC — $106,450 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture — $100,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetMichigan Saves — $99,252 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFriendship House Association of American Indians Inc — $97,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCultivate Charlottesville — $90,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetTerra BIRDS — $90,000 over 2y, 13% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Energy …The Kresge FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…The Energy FoundationThe McKnight Foundati…National Recreation a…The Schmidt Family Fo…Windward FundNatural Resources Def…National Fish and Wil…The Minneapolis Found…Movement Strategy Cen…
United States Energy FoundationCA31.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Energy Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · National Recreation and Park Association · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Windward Fund · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Movement Strategy Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Funders Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
  • Pinelands Preservation Alliance — 35% of income from government
  • Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
  • Urban Oasis Project Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Environmental Center Inc Dba - the Environmental Center — 0% of income from government
  • Connecticut Citizen Research Group Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
42report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines