· Public charity
Dakota Medical Charities
With the aim to positively impact health in our region, Dakota Medical Charities hosts a family of programs and education initiatives.
Read this first · the figures below need context
84% of Dakota Medical Charities’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Dakota Medical Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 20 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $1,863,370 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,115,060 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $251,690 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $183k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $156k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Dakota Medical Foundation | $1,483,620 |
| Impact Foundation | $88,500 |
| UND Alumni Association & Foundation | $67,000 |
| Hospice of the Red River Valley | $23,000 |
| YWCA Cass Clay | $21,500 |
| Golden Drive Homeless Kids LLC | $20,000 |
| Brave the Shave | $20,000 |
| Soul Solutions Recovery Center Inc | $18,000 |
| Churches United for the Homeless | $15,250 |
| Oak Grove Lutheran School | $12,000 |
| Saint Gianna's Home Inc | $11,500 |
| Memory Cafe of the Red River Valley | $11,000 |
| Emerging Prairie | $10,500 |
| Northern Cass Community Health & Wellness Center | $10,000 |
| Community Violence Intervention Center Inc | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $349k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UAUND Alumni Association and Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $398k · revenue +2%
- YCYWCA CASS CLAY8× · 2017–2024 · $159k · revenue +95%
- LALAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC2× · 2017–2018 · $110k · revenue +123%
Funded once
- IHINNOVIS HEALTH LLCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $63k · revenue +52%
- FFIRSTLINKgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +128%
- BGBIO Girls Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
The mission of the Winona Health Foundation is to gather, steward, and distribute resources needed to support and advance the mission of Winona Health and its affiliates.
Northeastern Mental Health Center-Our Mission is your vision for health, wellness and recovery.
Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri
To get people with addiction and their loved ones well.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
Serve as a local access to a full range of health care services. continue as a leader in primary care for the whole family, in care of the elderly, and in emergency services. Function as a focal point for health education and wellness.
St. Luke's Home and its assisted living facility, Park Avenue Villa, exist to provide a continuum of quality care to God's people, creating a compassionate, comfortable, and family oriented atmosphere, striving to enhance the dignity and…
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is Saint Gianna and Pietro Molla Maternity Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dakota Medical Foundation ↗
- Who funds Impact Foundation ↗
- Who funds UND Alumni Association and Foundation ↗
- Who funds YWCA CASS CLAY ↗
- Who funds LAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Soul Solutions Recovery Center Inc ↗
- Who funds INNOVIS HEALTH LLC ↗
- Who funds CHURCHES UNITED ↗
- Who funds FIRSTLINK ↗
- Who funds HALEY'S HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGING PRAIRIE ↗
- Who funds TNT Kid's Fitness ↗
- Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds PEACE OFFICER JAIL CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Saint Gianna and Pietro Molla Maternity Home Inc ↗
- Who funds Lend A Hand Up Inc ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds BIO Girls Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
- Who funds VALLEY CHRISTIAN COUNSELING & WELLNESS ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds BRAVE THE SHAVE ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN DRIVE HOMELESS KIDS LLC ↗
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTA SAFETY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds North Dakota Assistive ↗
- Who funds Red River Childrens Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND ↗
- Who funds RIVERVIEW HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY WELLNESS LLC ↗
- Who funds The Great North Pole ↗
- Who funds Memory Cafe of the Red River Valley ↗
- Who funds FRASER LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dakota Medical Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · The Barry Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Impact Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way of Cass-Clay · Offutt Family Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dakota Medical Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.