· Private foundation
The Bob and Sally Clayburgh Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $44k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST NICHOLAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $13,500 |
| GRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| EMPIRE ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| ST OLAF COLLEGE | $7,500 |
| COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER INC | $7,500 |
| ST PAUL'S EPISOCPAL CHURCH | $3,500 |
| ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EAEMPIRE ARTS CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +32%
- NRNORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +21%
- CVCOMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- GFGRAND FORKS PARKS AND RECREATIONone grant, 2019 · $10k
- UAUND ALUMNI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
- SOSAINT OLAF COLLEGEone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide care to refugee families.
Promote economic growth in grand forks, north dakota and the surrounding communities through the attraction of new industries and expansion of current businesses.
The Greater Portland Immigrant Welcome Center serves as a hub of collaboration that strengthens the immigrant community through language acquisition, economic integration and civic engagement.
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
The northwest consumer law center zealously advocates, litigates, and promotes access to justice for low and moderate income clients, and through its education programs, empowers consumers with the knowledge and resources to protect their…
The national nordic museum shares nordic culture, values and ideas with people of all ages and backgrounds to create connections, generate dialogue, and inspire new perspectives.
To facilitate healing and justice for victims of sexual and physical abuse, neglect and exploitation and to engage the community to protect and support children.
The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.
The mission of greater minneapolis crisis nursery is to end the abuse and neglect of children and create strong and healthy families.
Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.
We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Forks Children's Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Walker Area Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMPIRE ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Portland ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP ↗
- Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Walker Area Community Center ↗
- Who funds US FDN FOR THE CHILDREN OF HAITI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Myra Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Bob and Sally Clayburgh Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.