· Public charity
Impact Foundation
With a mission to build the capacity of nonprofits, businesses, and individuals to maximize their community impact, Impact Foundation's overall goal is to dramatically improve its nonprofit partners' capacity to produce superior results.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $1,407,733 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,596,017 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $188,284 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $94k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $254k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
- $250k+1 grant · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Prairie Heights Church | $750,000 |
| Bethel University | $140,000 |
| Living Word Lutheran Church | $100,000 |
| ND Department of Veterans Affairs | $70,000 |
| FM Area Foundation | $46,000 |
| Great Plains Food Bank | $32,146 |
| YWCA Cass Clay | $27,300 |
| NDSU Foundation and Alumni Assn | $21,387 |
| The Great North Pole | $21,000 |
| Casselton Park District | $17,100 |
| Feed My Starving Children Coon Rapids | $15,000 |
| Milwaukee Rescue Mission | $15,000 |
| Fargo Memorial Honor Guard | $15,000 |
| Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church UAC | $12,500 |
| Fix It Forward Ministry Inc | $11,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $309k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $258k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGThe Great North Pole2× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +88%
- NDNorth Dakota State University Foundation3× · 2020–2024 · $131k · revenue +245%
- CCCAPSTONE CLASSICAL ACADEMY2× · 2022–2023 · $108k · revenue +139%
Funded once
- BCBETHEL CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $50k
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $27k
- FMFURNITURE MISSION OF THE RED RIVER VALLEYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +183%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness
To get people with addiction and their loved ones well.
Providing support for people in achieving success in their life and their community.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
To promote equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income clients through quality legal assistance
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Water Works Sea Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Great North Pole ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND ↗
- Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds CAPSTONE CLASSICAL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds YWCA CASS CLAY ↗
- Who funds FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Dakota Medical Foundation ↗
- Who funds LOCUS IMPACT INVESTING ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds ARTHUR W JONES POST 7564 ↗
- Who funds WEST RIVER HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS PARTNERSHIP OF THE RED RIVE ↗
- Who funds CHURCHES UNITED ↗
- Who funds Fargo Union Mission ↗
- Who funds F5 PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Amistad Worldwide ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds EMERGING PRAIRIE ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Red River Valley ↗
- Who funds Towner County Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY TO SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds LANDON'S LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fargo Park District Foundation ↗
- Who funds Village Family Service Center ↗
- Who funds FARGO MEMORIAL HONOR GUARD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Dakota Medical Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · North Dakota Community Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Offutt Family Foundation · United Way of Cass-Clay · Great Plains Food Bank
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Impact Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Impact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.