Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Impact Foundation

With a mission to build the capacity of nonprofits, businesses, and individuals to maximize their community impact, Impact Foundation's overall goal is to dramatically improve its nonprofit partners' capacity to produce superior results.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$2.0MHuman Services$624kEducation$445kRecreation & Sports$324kFood & Nutrition$297kHealth$282kPublic Safety & Disaster$163kYouth Development$142kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 30 grants below total $1,407,733 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,596,017 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $188,284 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $254k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$11,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Prairie Heights Church$750,000
Bethel University$140,000
Living Word Lutheran Church$100,000
ND Department of Veterans Affairs$70,000
FM Area Foundation$46,000
Great Plains Food Bank$32,146
YWCA Cass Clay$27,300
NDSU Foundation and Alumni Assn$21,387
The Great North Pole$21,000
Casselton Park District$17,100
Feed My Starving Children Coon Rapids$15,000
Milwaukee Rescue Mission$15,000
Fargo Memorial Honor Guard$15,000
Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church UAC$12,500
Fix It Forward Ministry Inc$11,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $309k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REACH: $10k → 11%MadisonHome: $7k → 16%Alpha Opportunities Inc: $5k → 11%Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch-Minot: $10k → 10%The Great North Pole: $146k → 12%Community Violence Intervention Center: $7k → 13%Global Friends Coalition: $6k → 13%The Great North Pole: $21k → 12%Handi-Wheels Transportation: $10k → 12%Youthworks: $15k → 12%FirstLink: $15k → 12%YMCA of Cass and Clay Counties: $10k → 12%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $8k → 12%Fraser Ltd: $8k → 12%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $6k → 12%Hospice of the Red River Valley: $6k → 12%Fix It Forward Ministry Inc: $12k → 12%Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch - Fgo: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 30 repeat orgs$824k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
47

Total granted

$3.8M
$566k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+28%

Still filing today

73%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $258k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The Great North Pole
    2× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +88%
  • ND
    North Dakota State University Foundation
    3× · 2020–2024 · $131k · revenue +245%
  • CC
    CAPSTONE CLASSICAL ACADEMY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $108k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • BC
    BETHEL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2020 · $27k
  • FM
    FURNITURE MISSION OF THE RED RIVER VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $22k · revenue +183%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
2
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
3
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
4
Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency

Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…

Human Services
5
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
6
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

8
Family Promise of Greater Des Moines

To provide shelter and services to families experiencing homelessness

9
Face It Together - Bismarck-Mandan

To get people with addiction and their loved ones well.

Human Services
10
Lake Region Corporation

Providing support for people in achieving success in their life and their community.

11
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

12
Dakota Plains Legal Services

To promote equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income clients through quality legal assistance

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Water Works Sea Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr12%11%5–10yr16%19%10–20yr17%15%20–35yr17%21%35–55yr20%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr12%7%5–10yr16%7%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr17%6%35–55yr20%60%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/97
the rest of the field
11%
947/8,439

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/76
Grantees still filing
51/76
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FARGO PRAIRIE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE — $1,500,000 · OtherFARGO PRAIRIE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CHURCH OF THE NAZARENECasselton Parks and Recreation — $397,367 · OtherCasselton Parks and RecreationLIVING WORD LUTHERAN CHURCH — $320,000 · OtherLIVING WORD LUTHERAN CHURCHND Department of Veterans Affairs — $305,350 · OtherND Department of Veterans AffairsLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND — $156,783 · Other+51 more — $900,212 · Other+51 moreBETHEL UNIVERSITY — $140,000 · EducationNorth Dakota State University Foundation — $131,387 · EducationCAPSTONE CLASSICAL ACADEMY — $107,910 · EducationThe Great North Pole — $167,242 · Human ServicesFURNITURE MISSION OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY — $22,165 · Human ServicesHospice of the Red River Valley — $19,300 · Human ServicesDAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDATION — $18,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS — $15,000 · Human ServicesFIRSTLINK — $15,000 · Human Services+11 more — $95,100 · Human ServicesDakota Medical Foundation — $68,000 · HealthWEST RIVER HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $33,100 · HealthTowner County Medical Center Inc — $18,350 · HealthSoul Solutions Recovery Center Inc — $10,000 · HealthJamestown Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc — $9,500 · HealthRIVERVIEW HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $8,000 · HealthFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $96,000 · PhilanthropyFARGO MEMORIAL HONOR GUARD — $15,000 · PhilanthropyMISSOURI SLOPE AREAWIDE UNITED WAY — $8,000 · PhilanthropyYWCA CASS CLAY — $103,980 · Housing & ShelterWELCOME HOUSE INC — $7,000 · Housing & ShelterGreat Plains Food Bank — $80,246 · Food & NutritionWATER WORKS SEA INC — $10,754 · Food & NutritionTHE WELCOME TABLE INC — $7,000 · Food & NutritionFARM RESCUE — $5,400 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,579,712Education$379,297Human Services$351,807Health$146,950Philanthropy$119,000Housing & Shelter$110,980Food & Nutrition$103,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Great North Pole — $167,242 over 2y, 21% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND — $156,783 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY — $140,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Dakota State University Foundation — $131,387 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCAPSTONE CLASSICAL ACADEMY — $107,910 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetYWCA CASS CLAY — $103,980 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $96,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank — $80,246 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDakota Medical Foundation — $68,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOCUS IMPACT INVESTING — $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH DAKOTA — $46,510 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetARTHUR W JONES POST 7564 — $44,737 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWEST RIVER HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $33,100 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ARTS PARTNERSHIP OF THE RED RIVE — $30,770 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFargo Union Mission — $28,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetF5 PROJECT — $26,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAmistad Worldwide — $24,250 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetEMERGING PRAIRIE — $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHospice of the Red River Valley — $19,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTowner County Medical Center Inc — $18,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY TO SCIENCE CENTER INC — $17,100 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY INC — $17,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLANDON'S LIGHT FOUNDATION — $16,300 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFargo Park District Foundation — $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVillage Family Service Center — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARGO MEMORIAL HONOR GUARD — $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIRSTLINK — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND FORKS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWellspring for the World Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budget4 LUV OF DOG RESCUE — $14,080 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES — $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA FFA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $12,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMemory Cafe of the Red River Valley — $11,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetHigher Power Automotive Ministries Inc — $11,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWATER WORKS SEA INC — $10,754 over 1y, 32% of budgetFARGO-MOORHEAD ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $10,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRURAL ENRICHMENT AND COUNSELING — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEGACY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSoul Solutions Recovery Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHEAVENS HELPERS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHandi-Wheels Transportation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetYMCA of the Northern Sky — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN PUBLIC RADIO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring FoundationND88.8× affinity42 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Dakota Medical Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · North Dakota Community Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Offutt Family Foundation · United Way of Cass-Clay · Great Plains Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Impact Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Impact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph