Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona

PROMOTING POPULATION HEALTH AND COMMUNITY WELLNESS THROUGHOUT SOUTHEAST ARIZONA.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
135
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$383k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of THE LEGACY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEAST ARIZONA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 135 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k117 grants · $207k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $261k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $383k
$1,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COCHISE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$383,056
DRAGONFLY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BISBEE DOUGLAS UNIT$50,000
STEP UP BISBEE NACO$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SIERRA VISTA$50,000
ARIZONA BORDER ALLIANCE$50,000
WILLCOX COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$45,000
CITY OF DOUGLAS$32,500
SONOITA COMPANY ARIZONA RANGERS$30,000
WINCHESTER HEIGHTS HEALTH ORGANIZATION$28,510
CITY OF WILLCOX$25,000
THE BUTTERFLY CLUB$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
SOUTHERN ARIZONA AIDS FOUNDATION (SAAF)$10,000
CHIRICAHUA HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $522k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOOD SAMARITAN QUIBURI MISSION: $67k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $19k → 14%STEP UP BISBEENACO: $50k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%STEP UP BISBEE NACO: $50k → 18%CROSSROADS NOGALES MISSION: $1k → 19%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $3k → 11%AYUDA SMILES INC: $3k → 15%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%SR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA: $5k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA: $5k → 19%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC: $4k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA: $4k → 19%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC: $3k → 19%ROOTS & ROADS COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $37k → 15%ROOTS & ROADS COMMUNITY HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%DOUGLAS ARC: $5k → 18%DOUGLAS AREA FOOD BANK: $4k → 18%DOUGLAS ARC: $4k → 18%DOUGLAS ARC: $4k → 18%DOUGLAS ARC: $3k → 18%DOUGLAS ARC: $2k → 18%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC: $2k → 19%CHILD AND FAMILY RESOURCES: $30k → 15%DOUGLAS ARC: $2k → 18%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC: $1k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC: $850 → 19%SAHARA HUMANITARIAN RESOURCE INC: $10k → 18%ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $30k → 15%AVIVA CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $2k → 15%SAHARA HUMANITARIAN RESOURCE INC: $3k → 18%SAHARA HUMANITARIAN RESOURCE INC: $2k → 18%SAHARA HUMANITARIAN RESOURCE INC: $1k → 18%ARIZONA BORDER ALLIANCE: $50k → 18%COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $33k → 18%COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $5k → 18%SIERRA VISTA SYMPHONY: $5k → 18%COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $4k → 18%COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 18%COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $3k → 18%ANCHOR HOUSE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $2k → 18%CHILD AND FAMILY RESOURCES: $1k → 18%COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.1M · 97 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

97 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
95

Total granted

$7.1M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+5%

Still filing today

51%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $345k · revenue +195%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $237k · revenue +128%
  • SA
    SOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $111k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • LF
    LA FRONTERA
    one grant, 2022 · $751k
  • CF
    Community Food Bank Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $275k · revenue -6%
  • HC
    HEALTH CURRENT
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
3
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
4
Arizona Site Steward Program Foundation
Education
5
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
6
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
7
Southeastern Arizona Community Unique Services

To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.

Health
8
Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona

The Community Awareness Resource Entity of Arizona (CareAz) is a community-based organization dedicated to reducing the harmful effects of substance use disorder through comprehensive prevention, treatment, recovery, and reentry support.…

Health
9
The Bisbee Foundation Inc

Our focus is to work with groups and individuals who are in the arts, humanities, education and historic preservation with goals designed to enhance Bisbees unique place in the history of the Southwest, the contribution made to Bisbees…

—
10
Caring Coalition Az

Provide food for at risk families

Human Services
11
Az Hugs
Human Services
12
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Technical Assistance Partnership of Arizona and the most unlike its peers is The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySouthern Arizona Community …Affordable Housing ProvidersCommunity Transformation Or…Cancer Patient Support Serv…Food Security & Basic NeedsChristian Service MinistriesYouth Dance & Performing Ar…Family Philanthropic Founda…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Southern Arizona Community …Independent Charter SchoolsCommunity Health & Social S…Community Health Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%9%<5yr15%20%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr12%9%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%6%<5yr15%12%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr18%47%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr13%10%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/148
the rest of the field
14%
675/4,804

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/92
Grantees still filing
51/92
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COCHISE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE — $1,263,450 · OtherCOCHISE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $938,461 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONALA FRONTERA — $750,778 · OtherLA FRONTERACOCHISE COLLEGE — $554,762 · OtherCOCHISE COLLEGESOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GOVERNMENTS ORGANIZATION — $419,435 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GOVERNMENTS ORGANIZATIONCITY OF DOUGLAS — $224,131 · OtherGOOD NEIGHBOR ALLIANCE — $221,500 · Other+140 more — $2,229,657 · Other+140 moreChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc — $345,230 · HealthChiricahua Co…HEALTH CURRENT — $150,000 · HealthHEALTH CURREN…WILLCOX AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSE — $133,702 · HealthWILLCOX AGAIN…SOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH — $110,500 · HealthSOUTHEAST ARI…Cochise Harm Reduction — $108,200 · HealthCochise Harm …WINCHESTER HEIGHTS HEALTH ORGANIZATION — $82,510 · HealthWINCHESTER HE…ECHOING HOPE RANCH — $42,450 · Health+12 more — $101,330 · Health+12 moreStep Up Bisbee-Naco Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesLOVE MUZIQ OPERATION 13 2 — $78,791 · Human ServicesTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — $67,200 · Human ServicesEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $56,500 · Human ServicesArizona Border Alliance — $50,000 · Human ServicesCOCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC dba LORIS PLACE — $47,100 · Human ServicesRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation — $38,625 · Human ServicesCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $31,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC — $23,809 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $23,500 · Human ServicesSierra Vista Symphony Association — $21,750 · Human Services+8 more — $49,694 · Human ServicesBoys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc — $236,505 · Youth DevelopmentChampions for Youth Foundation — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentARIZONA RANGERS — $40,176 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Club of Bisbee Arizona — $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food Bank Inc — $275,000 · Food & NutritionHEALTHY BISBEE INC — $21,229 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $10,000 · Food & NutritionBISBEE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $73,029 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY SYNERGY SOLUTIONS CORP — $28,000 · Community ImprovementAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD — $24,000 · Community ImprovementWillcox Theater and Arts Inc — $94,668 · Arts & CultureBI-NATIONAL ARTS INSTITUTE — $3,920 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,200 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,602,174Health$1,073,922Human Services$617,969Youth Development$399,681Food & Nutrition$306,229Community Improvement$125,029Arts & Culture$99,788

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc — $345,230 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $275,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc — $236,505 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR ALLIANCE — $221,500 over 5y, 19% of budgetHEALTH CURRENT — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWILLCOX AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSE — $133,702 over 3y, 78% of budgetSOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH — $110,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetCochise Harm Reduction — $108,200 over 3y, 26% of budgetChampions for Youth Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetStep Up Bisbee-Naco Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetWillcox Theater and Arts Inc — $94,668 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetWINCHESTER HEIGHTS HEALTH ORGANIZATION — $82,510 over 2y, 20% of budgetLOVE MUZIQ OPERATION 13 2 — $78,791 over 5y, 89% of budgetBISBEE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $73,029 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetTHE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY — $67,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBisbee Vogue Inc — $67,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetPremier Alliances Inc — $65,450 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $56,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetArizona Border Alliance — $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCOCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC dba LORIS PLACE — $47,100 over 5y, 15% of budgetPatagonia Regional Aquatics Center — $45,500 over 1y, 46% of budgetECHOING HOPE RANCH — $42,450 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetARIZONA RANGERS — $40,176 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetMENTORING COCHISE KIDS INC — $39,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetRoots & Roads Community Hospice Foundation — $38,625 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC — $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Vincent De Paul Society St Andrews Conf of SV — $29,314 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY SYNERGY SOLUTIONS CORP — $28,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetNaco Wellness Initiative — $25,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECOTOPIA — $24,263 over 5y, 13% of budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD — $24,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF PATAGONIA INC — $23,809 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $23,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSierra Vista Symphony Association — $21,750 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetHEALTHY BISBEE INC — $21,229 over 4y, 24% of budgetNAMI Southeastern Arizona — $20,631 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetDouglas ARC Inc — $20,278 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Bisbee Arizona — $20,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE AMIGOS — $19,646 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetCOCHISE COUNTY SHERIFF ASSIST TEAM — $19,194 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetS A H A R A HUMANITARIAN RESOURCE INC — $15,678 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetTHE LEGACY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEAST ARIZONA — $13,949 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC — $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Arizona Child and Family Advocacy Network — $12,732 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetOur Lady of the Mountains — $11,800 over 2y, 9.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CURRENT ↗
  • Who funds WILLCOX AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST ARIZONA AREA HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Cochise Harm Reduction ↗
  • Who funds Champions for Youth Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Step Up Bisbee-Naco Inc ↗
  • Who funds Willcox Theater and Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER HEIGHTS HEALTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds LOVE MUZIQ OPERATION 13 2 ↗
  • Who funds BISBEE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Bisbee Vogue Inc ↗
  • Who funds Premier Alliances Inc ↗
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Border Alliance ↗
  • Who funds COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC dba LORIS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Patagonia Regional Aquatics Center ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Arizona Community Fou…Community Food Bank I…Bootheel FoundationHoward G Buffett Foun…Arizona Food Bank Net…United Way of Tucson …The Foundation for Co…Burton Family Foundat…Connie Hillman Family…Fiesta Events IncVirginia G Piper Char…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ75.2× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Community Food Bank Inc · Bootheel Foundation · Howard G Buffett Foundation · Arizona Food Bank Network · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Burton Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Fiesta Events Inc · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 230 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines