Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Nonprofit VOTE Inc

Nonprofit VOTE equips our nation's nonprofits with nonpartisan tools and resources to help the communities they serve to participate in voting and democracy.

$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Community Improvement$602kPublic Benefit$289kHousing & Shelter$239kPhilanthropy$52kCivil Rights$40kHuman Services$24kReligion$15kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $136,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $284,166 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $148,166 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $105k
$9,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$969k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Resource Center$40,000
Michigan Nonprofit Association$35,000
Democracy North Carolina$30,000
Human Service Chamber Foundation$9,000
Virginia Housing Alliance$8,000
AZ Impact for Good$7,000
United Way of Metropolitan Dallas$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Asian Pacific Amer Leadership Inst: $12k → 14%Asian American Federation: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$994k · 8 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
19

Total granted

$994k
$303k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-28%
+31%

Still filing today

88%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementCivil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $98k · revenue +11%
  • TN
    TIDES NETWORK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +103%
  • VH
    VIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $39k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • NP
    NEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $83k · revenue +118%
  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • NY
    NEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
2
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
3
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
4
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
5
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
6
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
7
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
8
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
9
Public Affairs Council

Our mission is to advance the field of public affairs and provide tools and resources that enable public affairs executives and managers to achieve their business and professional goals.

—
10
Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy

To conduct research and educational programs on affordable energy policies, to advocate on behalf of affordable energy policies, and to implement and manage energy efficiency and related programs.

Human Services
11
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
12
Ampt Advancing Nonprofits

Advancing Nonprofits is committed to strengthening the organizational health and support long-term development of small nonprofits on Chicagos west and south sides while prioritizing Black- and Latine-led community organizations.…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Empowerment Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Virginia Housing Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%46%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $246,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INCNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $82,960 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INCTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementPOWER INTERFAITH INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementGreater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers — $14,500 · Community Improvement+3 more — $27,000 · Community Improvement+3 moreMICHIGAN NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION — $221,500 · OtherMICHIGAN NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $87,000 · OtherHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIAVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE — $39,000 · OtherVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCECIVICGEORGIA LLC — $24,670 · OtherCIVICGEORGIA LLCNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC — $15,000 · OtherGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC — $15,000 · Other+4 more — $35,133 · Other+4 moreDemocracy North Carolina — $232,500 · Civil RightsDemocracy North CarolinaNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN VOTE - MICHIGAN — $13,000 · Civil RightsUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE OHIO UUJO — $12,000 · Civil RightsNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE — $12,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO — $98,000 · EmploymentTIDES NETWORK — $45,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyINSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCEMENT — $12,400 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN SERVICE CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EducationMinnesota State College Student Association Inc — $9,000 · Education
Community Improvement$405,460Other$437,303Civil Rights$284,500Employment$98,000Philanthropy$52,000Human Services$24,400Education$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $246,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina — $232,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMICHIGAN NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION — $221,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCOALITION ON HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING IN OHIO — $98,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOUSING ALLIANCE OF PENNSYLVANIA — $87,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC — $82,960 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTIDES NETWORK — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA HOUSING ALLIANCE — $39,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP FUND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOWER INTERFAITH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA ADVANCING COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGreater Cleveland Neighborhood Centers — $14,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN VOTE - MICHIGAN — $13,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCEMENT — $12,400 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE OHIO UUJO — $12,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE — $12,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON PROGRESS FORUM — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN INDIAN FAMILY COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPAFCO EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE HUMAN SERVICE CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMinnesota State College Student Association Inc — $9,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe League of Women Voters of the Greater Dayton Area — $5,133 over 1y, 7.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Venture FundTides FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…The Ford FoundationWallace H Coulter Tru…Wallace H Coulter Fou…Movement Strategy Cen…The Kresge FoundationAARPWK Kellogg FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…
New Venture FundDC23× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Wallace H Coulter Trust · Wallace H Coulter Foundation · Movement Strategy Center · The Kresge Foundation · AARP · WK Kellogg Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nonprofit VOTE Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nonprofit VOTE Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nonprofit VOTE Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines