Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES (Maryland) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,122,198 to it, the largest being WITH FOUNDATION ($876,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.6M
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$2.1M
Net assets
$3.4M
9/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%
01What it does

What Association of University Centers on Disabilities does

Mission

Aucd's mission is to advance policies and practices that improve the health, education, social and economic well-being of all people with developmental and other disabilities, their families, and their communities by supporting our members in research, education, health and service activities that achieve our vision.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Hhs-oidd: a project of aucd, in partnership with the office of intellectual and developmental disabilities (oidd), to strengthen and support the network of university centers of excellence in developmental disabilities (ucedds) through training and technical assistance. The purpose of this project is for the administration of community living, administration on disabilities, and oidd to contract for a performance-based arrangement for providing coordinated, comprehensive, and specialized training and technical assistance (t/ta) to ucedds.

    $1,031,104 spentof which $400,921 as grants
    28% of program spending
  2. Itac: the purpose of the interdisciplinary technical assistance center (itac) on autism and developmental disabilities at aucd is to improve the health of infants, children, and adolescents who have, or are at risk for developing, asds and other developmental disabilities. The center accomplishes this by providing technical assistance to interdisciplinary training programs (I.e., the lends and developmental -behavioral pediatrics (dbp) programs) to better train professionals to utilize valid and reliable screening tools to diagnose or rule out and provide evidence-based interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (asd) and other developmental disabilities.

    $613,541 spentof which $25,054 as grants
    17% of program spending
  3. Acl fe: aucd will create (and/or build upon) a partnership to develop the proposed approach and plan to advance peer-to-peer models for aac. The partnership will play an active role in the project, providing guidance and general direction in the design and implementation of the project. The partnership must include, but not be limited to, individuals that use/potential users of aac, nonprofit community-based service-provider organization(s), direct support professionals, self-advocacy organizations, youth and adults with id/dd, families, related service providers, educators, and others in their support system. The partnership must include individuals from multiply marginalized communities.

    $446,810 spentof which $364,210 as grants
    12% of program spending
  4. Membership dues

    $453,815 spent$710,838 earned by the program
    12% of program spending
  5. Annual meeting

    $403,604 spent$196,573 earned by the program
    11% of program spending
  6. Cdc: a project of aucd, in partnership with cdc, to increase the public health capacity of aucd network centers across the country. Efforts include providing technical assistance to the act early network; facilitating the friends of the national center on birth defects and developmental disabilities; informing national, state, and local partners through regular communication and training; and facilitating multi-site projects that aim to improve the health and wellness of individuals with disabilities.

    $170,172 spentof which $77,315 as grants
    5% of program spending
  7. University of massachusetts

    $155,566 spent
    4% of program spending
  8. Ucla regents hhs

    $126,806 spent
    3% of program spending
  9. Astho

    $96,499 spentof which $89,137 as grants
    3% of program spending
  10. With foundation 2024

    $82,523 spent
    2% of program spending
  11. Ecpec (uconn)

    $40,317 spent
    1% of program spending
  12. Iddrc

    $13,195 spent
    0% of program spending
  13. Brandies university

    $9,161 spent
    0% of program spending
  14. University of new hampshire

    $8,602 spent
    0% of program spending
  15. Kessler foundation

    $16,617 spent
    0% of program spending
  16. Hsri

    $10,835 spent
    0% of program spending
  17. Dream fund

    $2,315 spent
    0% of program spending
  18. University of minnesota

    $1,440 spent
    0% of program spending
  19. Anne rudigier fund

    $500 spent
    0% of program spending
  20. Regents of the university of minnesota

    $250 spent
    0% of program spending

The 20 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,683,672.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($6.1M) Expenses 100 ($6.1M) Net assets 100 ($2.3M)2018 Revenue 122 ($7.5M) Expenses 127 ($7.8M) Net assets 85 ($2.0M)2019 Revenue 120 ($7.3M) Expenses 121 ($7.5M) Net assets 81 ($1.9M)2020 Revenue 87 ($5.3M) Expenses 86 ($5.3M) Net assets 84 ($2.0M)2021 Revenue 180 ($11M) Expenses 166 ($10M) Net assets 130 ($3.0M)2022 Revenue 230 ($14M) Expenses 211 ($13M) Net assets 164 ($3.8M)2023 Revenue 196 ($12M) Expenses 188 ($12M) Net assets 188 ($4.4M)2024 Revenue 131 ($8.0M) Expenses 130 ($8.0M) Net assets 195 ($4.5M)2025 Revenue 75 ($4.6M) Expenses 96 ($5.9M) Net assets 145 ($3.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (75)Expenses (96)Net assets (145)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $6.1M to $8.8M (+45%).

$3.4M
$3.7M
$3.5M
$2.7M
$5.3M
$6.1M
$8.8M
$6.9M
$5.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 66% · 2018 74% · 2019 76% · 2020 70% · 2021 85% · 2022 89% · 2023 85% · 2024 62% · 2025 71%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

79% of ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$12k
’17
−$351k
’18
−$109k
’19
$78k
’20
$811k
’21
$1.1M
’22
$456k
’23
$57k
’24
−$1.3M
’25
2.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed242424232121242124
Joined·+8+5+6+5+5+10+7+10
No longer listed·857757107
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 5 funders, grant income rose $260k → $607k.

2 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

52% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES.

41%
largest funder
80%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 97% · 2018 95% · 2019 65% · 2020 72% · 2021 44% · 2022 37% · 2023 73% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

30% of ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 69% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland, across 6 states in all.

IL
MA
OH
NJ
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Maryland out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $8k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 5 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−29% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve2.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $52.1M on record.

Federal$52.1M
grants $45.3Mcontracts $6.8M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$50.5M
  • Department of State$1.6M
  • Department of the Interior$25k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

63% of spending goes to programs.

Program 63%Management 37%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES?
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES (Maryland) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,122,198 to it, the largest being WITH FOUNDATION ($876,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $2,122,198 in grants to ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES?
WITH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $876,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing