Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Association of University Centers on Disabilities

Aucd's mission is to advance policies and practices that improve the health, education, social and economic well-being of all people with developmental and other disabilities, their families, and their communities by supporting our members in research, education, health and service activities that achieve our vision.

$957k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$365k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $543k
  • $250k+1 grant · $365k
$82,743
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE CENTER$364,710
ILLINOIS ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM$171,844
UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON$156,131
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$82,743
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY$82,576
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$50,015
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$39,122
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$7,884
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY VOICES: $161k → 8%DOCS FOR TOTS: $89k → 6%FAMILY VOICES: $27k → 14%ARKANSAS CHAPTER AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $103k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S FORUM: $80k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $86k → 9%GREEN MOUNTAIN SELF-ADVOCATES INC: $22k → 9%FAMILY VOICES: $126k → 8%DOCS FOR TOTS: $81k → 6%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS: $176k → 14%MY HEALTH MY RESOURCES OF TERRANT COUNTY: $39k → 11%FAMILY VOICES: $21k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $40k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S FORUM: $78k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $68k → 9%FAMILY VOICES: $102k → 8%DOC FOR TOTS: $18k → 6%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS: $117k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S FORUM: $29k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $27k → 9%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS: $83k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $135k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $124k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26M · 92 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

92 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 84 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
35

Total granted

$26M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+23%

Still filing today

57%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $898k · revenue +57%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $896k · revenue +12%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $721k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AE
    ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $186k
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $163k · revenue +18%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF GEORGIA SERVICES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $147k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
2
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Dc Autism Parents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Developmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/129
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,436

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/73
Grantees still filing
59/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE — $2,230,642 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $1,404,055 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $794,310 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $778,916 · OtherGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITYIndiana University School of Medicine — $702,565 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC — $536,151 · Other+64 more — $7,990,115 · Other+64 moreOKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY — $1,455,900 · EducationOKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES…GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $897,959 · EducationGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $721,282 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY…University of Kentucky Research Foundation — $521,344 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky R…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $400,189 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $298,728 · Education+18 more — $1,718,796 · Education+18 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC — $896,213 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY …AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC — $528,696 · HealthAMERICAN THROMBOS…NATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE — $488,884 · HealthNATIONAL BLOOD CL…SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $435,606 · HealthSPINA BIFIDA ASSO…Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations — $396,139 · HealthJoint Commission …ADVOCATE NORTH SIDE HEALTH NETWORK — $178,971 · HealthHawai'i Pacific Health — $178,158 · HealthALL ALASKA PEDIATRIC PARTNERSHIP — $174,054 · HealthThe Childrens Hospital — $165,259 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER — $163,326 · Health+10 more — $612,634 · Health+10 moreFAMILY VOICES — $437,466 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS INC — $375,811 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES — $259,326 · Human ServicesDOCS FOR TOTS — $188,009 · Human ServicesAPNI INC — $188,001 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S FORUM INC — $187,379 · Human ServicesSOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION — $181,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS FOUNDATION — $143,845 · Human Services+2 more — $60,494 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS — $469,759 · Public BenefitSELF-ADVOCATES BECOMING EMPOWERED — $430,000 · Civil RightsUniversity of Guam Endowment Foundation Inc — $187,999 · InternationalHANDICAP INTERNATIONAL — $179,205 · International
Other$14,436,754Education$6,014,198Health$4,217,940Human Services$2,021,331Public Benefit$469,759Civil Rights$430,000International$367,204

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $897,959 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC — $896,213 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $721,282 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC — $536,151 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC — $528,696 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation — $521,344 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE — $488,884 over 3y, 35% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS — $469,759 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY VOICES — $437,466 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $435,606 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetSELF-ADVOCATES BECOMING EMPOWERED — $430,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $400,189 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJoint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations — $396,139 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS INC — $375,811 over 3y, 12% of budgetIllinois Assistive Technology Program — $332,597 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $298,728 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES — $259,326 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF IOWA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $243,206 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT HOME — $221,569 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $205,524 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $194,156 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOCS FOR TOTS — $188,009 over 3y, 12% of budgetBUILDING BRIGHT FUTURES STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL — $188,001 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetAPNI INC — $188,001 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetTHE PARENTS' PLACE OF MARYLAND INC — $188,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetDC AUTISM PARENTS — $187,999 over 3y, 87% of budgetUniversity of Guam Endowment Foundation Inc — $187,999 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S FORUM INC — $187,379 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION — $181,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetAmerican International College — $180,071 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHANDICAP INTERNATIONAL — $179,205 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetADVOCATE NORTH SIDE HEALTH NETWORK — $178,971 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHawai'i Pacific Health — $178,158 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $178,104 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $176,749 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALL ALASKA PEDIATRIC PARTNERSHIP — $174,054 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital — $165,259 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER — $163,326 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine — $149,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $140,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NETWORK OF COMMUNITY OPTIONS AND RESOURCES — $130,875 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC — $125,817 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $115,273 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION — $103,318 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $101,425 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $101,059 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSickle Cell Disease Association of America Inc — $95,460 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetWESTCHESTER INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT — $93,657 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VOICES ↗
  • Who funds SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SELF-ADVOCATES BECOMING EMPOWERED ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Assistive Technology Program ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF IOWA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOCS FOR TOTS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins Univers…The Trustees of Colum…American Heart Associ…American Cancer Socie…Georgetown UniversityYale UniversityEmory UniversityCystic Fibrosis Found…The George Washington…Brown UniversityThe Children's Hospit…National Collegiate A…
Johns Hopkins UniversityMD28.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Georgetown University · Yale University · Emory University · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The George Washington University · Brown University · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · National Collegiate Athletic Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of University Centers on Disabilities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Statewide Parent Advocacy Network Inc — 72% of income from government
  • Green Mountain Self Advocates Inc — 48% of income from government
  • Family Voices — 39% of income from government
  • Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Inc — 39% of income from government
  • The Parents' Place of Maryland Inc — 30% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
  • American International College — 1% of income from government
  • Children's Forum Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 128 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines