Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Council for Behavioral Health

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH dba national council for mental wellbeing is a membership organization that drives policy and social change on behalf of over 3,100 mental health and substance use treatment organizations and the more than (continued on schedule o) (continued) 10 million children, adults and families they serve.

$95k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202023.

Health$295kEducation$14kPhilanthropy$8kHuman Services$8kOther$85k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC DBA THE KENNEDY FORUM$50,000
MOBILIZE RECOVERY DBA THE VOICES PROJECT$25,000
FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUKE-DORF INC: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
NV
WY
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
KS
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$165k · 3 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
31

Total granted

$165k
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+48%

Still filing today

100%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $70k · revenue +454%
  • MR
    MOBILIZE RECOVERY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue +21%
  • FV
    FACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • Public Health Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • CM
    CORNERSTONE MONTGOMERYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +33%
  • CH
    CHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +87%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Mental Health

The center for mental health partners with people and communities to produce exceptional mental health and substance abuse services.

2
Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center Inc

To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.

Health
3
Mental Health Cooperative Inc

Mental health cooperative inc. (mhc) provides integrated health services that include behavioral health care, primary health care, addiction services, and community-based care management. mhc also provides emergency psychiatric services…

Health
4
Heritage Behavioral Health Center

Provide high quality, affordable treatment for emotional, mental and addictive disorders and promote behavioral health in the greater macon county area through education, outreach and prevention services.

Health
5
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
6
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
7
Healthcare Commons Inc

Mental health services

Health
8
North Central Missouri Mental Health Center

Nc mo mental health center delivers high quality trauma-informed behavioral health services in a caring and compassionate atmosphere that promotes dignity, builds on natural supports, encourages consumer choice, embraces cultural…

Health
9
Tcn Behavioral Health Services Inc

Improving lives by providing clinically excellent and accessible behavioral health services.

Health
10
Anchorage Community Mental Health Services Inc

To promote recovery and wellness by providing consumer-driven behavioral healthcare services.

Health
11
Mental Health Systems Inc

To improve the lives of individuals, families, and communities impacted by substance abuse and behavioral health disorders.

Health
12
Centennial Mental Health Center Inc

Our mission is to achieve excellence in the provision of behavioral health services that lead to optimal health and well being.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chestnut Health Systems Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mobilize Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAddiction Recovery ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
28/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $70,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INCMOBILIZE RECOVERY — $50,000 · HealthMOBILIZE RECOVERYFACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY — $45,000 · HealthFACES & VOICES OF RECOVERYPublic Health Institute — $10,000 · Health+16 more — $120,000 · Health+16 moreCORNERSTONE MONTGOMERY — $8,500 · OtherCORNERSTONE MONTGOMERYNORTHEAST KINGDOM HUMAN SERVICES INC — $8,500 · OtherNORTHEAST KINGDOM HUMAN…RIMROCK FOUNDATION — $8,500 · OtherRIMROCK FOUNDATIONHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY MHMR CENTER — $7,500 · OtherHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY …METROPOLITAN HUMAN SERVICES DISTRICT — $7,500 · OtherMETROPOLITAN HUMAN SERV…PEAK WELLNESS CENTER — $7,500 · OtherPEAK WELLNESS CENTERIllinois Primary Health Care Association — $7,500 · OtherIllinois Primary Health…NEW YORK STATE COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC — $7,500 · OtherNEW YORK STATE COUNCIL …HINDS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $7,500 · OtherHINDS BEHAVIORAL HEALTHGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC — $7,500 · OtherGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL …ILLINOIS ALCOHOLISM & DRUG DEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION DBA IABH — $6,800 · OtherILLINOIS ALCOHOLISM & D…Pathpoint — $7,500 · EducationNATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $6,643 · EducationTHE ALLEGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 · PhilanthropyNEW NARRATIVE — $7,500 · Human Services
Health$295,000Other$84,800Education$14,143Philanthropy$7,500Human Services$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $70,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMOBILIZE RECOVERY — $50,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFACES & VOICES OF RECOVERY — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE MONTGOMERY — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTNUT HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST KINGDOM HUMAN SERVICES INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIMROCK FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEWAYS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health Resource League for McHenry County Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetNASSAU COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH ALCOHOLISM DBA STARTING POINT BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ALLEGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AND GUIDANCE CENTER OF TOPEKA INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK WELLNESS CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPALACHEE CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Johnson County Mental Health Center Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetIllinois Primary Health Care Association — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STATE COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP INC THE GABLES AT COBB VILLAGE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPathpoint — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY CENTER FOR HUMAN ADVANCEMENT — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STATE COALITION FOR CHILDREN'S BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCENTRAL MINNESOTA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE FAMILY INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS ALCOHOLISM & DRUG DEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION DBA IABH — $6,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CORPS INC — $6,643 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHSIDE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation IncCT12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Council for Behavioral Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Lifeways Inc13% of income from government
  • Northeast Kingdom Human Services Inc8% of income from government
  • Meridian Behavioral Healthcare Inc7% of income from government
  • New Narrative6% of income from government
  • National Mental Health Corps Inc4% of income from government
  • Willamette Family Inc4% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Montgomery3% of income from government
  • Nassau County Mental Health Alcoholism Dba Starting Point Behavioral Healthcare1% of income from government
  • Henderson Behavioral Health Inc0% of income from government
  • Apalachee Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $48k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph