Skip to content

Idaho · Private foundation

Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2019
43
Grants FY2019
40
Organizations funded FY2019
20%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 24 organizations, $11k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

29
’17
14
’18
24
’19
16
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$100
Largest grant, FY2019
$2,500
Organizations funded a year
26 to 45
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
14
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 20% of the organizations Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
Food & NutritionEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201940$10k20%
FY201826$11k19%
FY201745$10kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$84kEducation$17kHuman Services$6kCivil Rights$5kHealth$5kArts & Culture$3kCrime & Legal$1kEnvironment$992Other$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
WY
IA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
DC
MS
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 38 grantees

Plus 24 recipients with no EIN on record ($21k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMacalester College: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWood River Women's Foundation: $3,200 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUniversity of Wyoming Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMayflower Homes Inc: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlaine County Hunger Coalition Inc: $750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSawtooth Botanical Garden: $425 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Luke's Wood River Foundation Inc: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSun Valley Summer Symphony Inc: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere Inc: $390 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSmithsonian Institution: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Women's History Museum: $301 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSun Valley Center for the Arts Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Conservation League Inc: $252 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBlaine County Seniors Council Inc the Senior Connection: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals Inc: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAnd Justice for All: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Alta Club Building Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Crisis Hotline Inc: $150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetArthritis Foundation Inc: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fund for Idaho: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIdaho Law Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Luis Valley Immigrant Resource: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $95 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $75 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $65 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Wildlife Federation: $55 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Foodbank Warehouse: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Park Foundation: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Fund for Unicef: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Lung Association: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 35.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spur Community Foundation IncID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · Martin Djos Family Foundation · The Pesky Family Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Dan and Micki Chapin Fund Inc · The Rhea S Schwartz & Paul Martin Wolff Foundation · The Von Der Heyden Family Foundation · Boswell Family Foundation · The Springcreek Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation with peer funders

About Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation

How much does Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation give?
Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation reported 43 grants totaling $11,375 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 26 and 45 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Philanthropy (67%), Education (14%), Human Services (5%).
Who are Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Macalester College ($10k), Wood River Women's Foundation ($3k), University of Wyoming Foundation ($2k).
Does Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Spur Community Foundation Inc, Martin Djos Family Foundation, The Pesky Family Foundation Inc.
Where is Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation based?
Maneval Reister Conard Family Foundation is based in ID.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maneval Reister Conard Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph