Kentucky · Nonprofit
A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC
A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC (Kentucky) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,331,167 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($1,355,485). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 90% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Gheens Foundation Incshared funderslocal
- Council for Lifeportfolio match
- Vitamin Angel Alliance Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $133k → $221k.
12 of 31 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 90% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 31 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 58% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
93% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 63% · 2018 76% · 2019 47% · 2020 64% · 2021 51% · 2022 58% · 2023 57% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
30% of A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
90% of A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $234k that is directly attributable, 59% of it comes from funders outside Kentucky, across 8 states.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 10 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 31 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Gheens Foundation Incshared funderslocalKY · backs 181 organizations that share your funders · funds 234 organizations near you
- Council for Lifeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Vitamin Angel Alliance Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Robbinsdale Women's Centerportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Vitamin Bridgeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Knights of Columbus Charities Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Save the Storksportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Susan B Anthony List Education Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dayenu Foundation Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- For His Glory Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Weingartz Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Brown-Forman Foundationshared funderslocalKY · backs 57 organizations that share your funders · funds 70 organizations near you
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Kentucky
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
69% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC?
- A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC (Kentucky) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,331,167 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($1,355,485). 19 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 90% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC have?
- IRS filings report 31 organizations giving $2,331,167 in grants to A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC, 19 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC?
- NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,355,485 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like A CHOICE FOR LIFE INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kentucky. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 31funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing