California · Nonprofit
2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL
2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL (California) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,424,608 to it, the largest being PERIGEE FUND ($1,153,500). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $1.3M
- Funders on record
- 22
- Grants received
- $2.4M
- Net assets
- $1.1M
What 2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal does
Mission
The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. The policy center has been recognized by the bridgespan group as a "field catalyst" for its role in identifying systems-level barriers and solutions, conducting research, informing the field, driving cross-sector, legislative, and regulatory policy solutions, and reporting on progress.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Federal and state policy development and influence: as a think tank, we inform and influence the development of federal and state policy. Federal policy: we continued to provide direct support to the federal maternal mental health task force, which the policy center championed in 2023 through federal legislation we wrote and advanced: the triumph for new moms act. As a result of this work, the first report to congress on maternal mental health and the first national strategy were released in 2024 and 2025, respectively. In 2025, as the federal task force concluded, we convened former members to organize the field around key priorities within the national maternal mental health strategy. Key priorities we are facilitating include ob/gyn screening and measurement of screening, suicide prevention, affordable maternity care, and comprehensive maternity care centers (cmccs), including midwifery, mental health, doula care, and pediatrics. Each of these priorities includes philanthropic and federal policy solutions. We kept maternal mental health on the minds of leaders at federal agencies by meeting with them regularly, including the centers for medicaid and medicare services (cms), the…
$192,534 spent24% of program spendingMonitoring screening and reimbursement: the policy center researches, reports on, and pushes for the implementation of ongoing levers to advance maternal mental health (mmh) systems change, including payment and screening/treatment measures. As part of our work on health insurer payor levers, we report regularly on mmh screening and follow-up rates by analyzing hedis data (a standardized set of performance measures developed by the ncqa) as well as claims data. The reports and the state report cards referenced below are available on our website, www.policycentermmh.org/reports. Our analysis, "the role of medicaid in advancing obstetric provider maternal mental health screening and treatment," highlighted the actions medicaid agencies can take to address screening, including the strategies of the states with the highest medicaid screening rates. We evaluated the extent to which ob providers submit separate claims to private insurers for mmh screening and follow-up treatment, outside the "bundled obstetric payment." this is contained in our new report titled "obstetric provider billing rates by private insurers for maternal mental health screening and treatment." this analysis of…
$127,742 spent16% of program spendingResearch, reports, resources & the forum: as a policy and research think tank, and "field catalyst" we conduct critical research, collate articles and external research, create issue briefs, implementation resources and technical assistance, and host webinars and our annual conference, the forum, to inform the field including the four key players (which we refer to as the 4ps) which are positioned to affectuate change (policymakers, payers, providers and philanthropy/non-profit/research partners). Research and reports: in may, which is maternal mental health awareness month, the policy center released our two landmark reports, the 3rd annual state report maternal mental health cards, and the maternal mental health county risk & resource report and map. At our congressional briefing. The report cards again relied on 18 data sets, including data produced externally and our own data/reports. There has still been meaningful progress as 26 states improved their mmh grades (and the u.s. Has inched up from a d+ to c-). The risk and resource report identified that the number of counties with severe risk for mmh disorders has tripled since 2023. The reports were featured in various local…
$112,054 spent$162,997 earned by the program14% of program spendingOther programs: general programs, communities of practice, co-laboratory, chw project.
$370,545 spent$178,347 earned by the program46% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $802,875.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $846k to $1.2M (+46%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2019 0% · 2020 0% · 2021 0% · 2022 0% · 2023 15% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
69% of 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Joy Burkhard
Executive director
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $68k → $481k.
8 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
69% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 35% · 2018 32% · 2019 87% · 2020 80% · 2021 96% · 2022 49% · 2023 55% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
21% of 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 41% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL draws 89% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 10 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $289k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 8,121 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,121 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
89% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
58%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL?
- 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL (California) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,424,608 to it, the largest being PERIGEE FUND ($1,153,500). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL have?
- IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $2,424,608 in grants to 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL?
- PERIGEE FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,153,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like 2020 MOM POLICY CENTER FOR MATERNAL find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing