· Private foundation
Good Neighbors Family Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k47 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| NANTUCKET BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $21,000 |
| ST JOHN'S FOOD FOR THE POOR FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| SUN VALLEY WRITERS CONFERENCE | $8,000 |
| ACHILLES INT'L CONN CHAPTER | $5,000 |
| FIRST FRUITS FARM | $5,000 |
| NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOC | $5,000 |
| NANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS (NISHA) | $2,800 |
| PROJECT OPEN HAND | $2,500 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $2,500 |
| DRAWBRIDGE | $2,500 |
| CHARLESTON GAILLARD CENTER | $2,500 |
| A SAFE PLACE | $2,500 |
| MARINA ORTH FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NBNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC8× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +98%
- YLYOUNG LIFE4× · 2017–2023 · $43k · revenue +59%
- ALASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC6× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +117%
Funded once
- MBMOST BLESSED SACRAMENT ELEM SCHOOL AND ANNUAL FUNDone grant, 2021 · $52k
- CICHRISTMAS IN APRILone grant, 2022 · $25k
- SLST LOUIS CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Our purpose is to offer our skills and hearts to help patients and families live each day with hope and dignity.
Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…
By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
111 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 111 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds DrawBridge ↗
- Who funds MARINA ORTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOME INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME BUILDERS CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Next Generation Scholars Inc ↗
- Who funds Vivalon ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ELDER SERVICES OF CAPE COD AND THE ISLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds A SAFE PLACE ↗
- Who funds OLNEY HELP INC ↗
- Who funds Maryland Cultural and Conference Center Inc (formerly MD Theatre for the Perfor ↗
- Who funds EAST COOPER MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Daniel Island Community Fund Inc · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Grace E & Louis Dewolff Foundation · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · Post and Courier Foundation · Lipscomb Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Good Neighbors Family Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Diakonia Inc — 51% of income from government
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
- Vita Nova Inc — 42% of income from government
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Beebe Medical Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Cape Henlopen Food Basket — 0% of income from government
- Artists Association of Nantucket Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Lighthouse School Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.