· Private foundation
Yerba Buena Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $147k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $347k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $450k
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANIFESTWORKS | $250,000 |
| ALMA BACKYARD FARMS | $250,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE | $125,000 |
| NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION | $125,000 |
| CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| HEALTHY HEARTS INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SILICON VALLEY | $50,000 |
| HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $36,000 |
| JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $36,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO OPERA | $25,000 |
| HAND IN HAND | $25,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| BONAFIDE | $25,000 |
| LOS ANGELES CONSERVANCY | $25,000 |
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $832k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABALMA BACKYARD FARM4× · 2020–2024 · $540k · revenue +12%
- MMANIFESTWORKS4× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +120%
- AFALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $430k · revenue +124%
Funded once
- JIJOHN IRWIN HOUSE PROJECT JUMPSTARTone grant, 2022 · $300k
- AAAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL HERITAG ACTION FUNDone grant, 2023 · $125k
- PRPROJECT REBOUND AT CSU FULLERTONone grant, 2020 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…
The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…
Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma and the most unlike its peers is Site-Specicific Dances Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALMA BACKYARD FARM ↗
- Who funds MANIFESTWORKS ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER ↗
- Who funds Healthy Hearts Institute ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Pruno Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Planting Justice ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Jumpstart Labs Inc DBA Jewish JUMPSTART JSLABS ↗
- Who funds REFOUNDRY INC ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA ↗
- Who funds THE BLUE CARD INC ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Architectural Heritage ↗
- Who funds BONAFIDE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
- Who funds 20 Summers Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds UJIMA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST ↗
- Who funds National AIDS Memorial Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · The Henry Mayo Newhall Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Yerba Buena Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- 20 Summers Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.