Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yellow-Crowned Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$590k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$282k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$1.9MEducation$883kEnvironment$710kHuman Services$620kHealth$159kInternational$128kArts & Culture$117kPublic Benefit$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $282k
$2,790
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$281,500
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$59,960
MONTECITO UNION SCHOOL FOUNDATION$30,000
RANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE$15,000
GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE$15,000
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$15,000
BARRINGTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,750
CALM$10,000
CATO INSTITUTE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$10,000
NEWBERRY LIBRARY$10,000
FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY$10,000
HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$9,750
PORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL$7,500
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $494k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $101k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $75k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $73k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $60k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $60k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $28k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $15k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $10k → 10%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $1k → 14%CLEARBROOK CENTER: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
RI
CA
CO
VA
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 71 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

71 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
25

Total granted

$4.8M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+17%

Still filing today

79%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +84%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $510k · revenue +561%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $448k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • GW
    George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • NC
    Northwest Community Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -3%
  • GS
    GWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -82%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

—
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
10
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Dre Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …School District FoundationsCommunity FoundationsYouth Development CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Senior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…United Way AffiliatesCancer Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%5%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr15%31%20–35yr9%21%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%42%10–20yr15%11%20–35yr9%19%35–55yr12%28%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/87
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/102,957

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/83
Grantees still filing
56/83
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,734,390 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INCBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC — $142,545 · PhilanthropyBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC+6 more — $41,865 · PhilanthropyTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $510,193 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDAPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL — $313,500 · OtherPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOLHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL — $162,500 · OtherHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOLFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY — $95,600 · OtherFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITYMontecito Union School Foundation — $73,150 · OtherCALM INC — $91,200 · Other+65 more — $537,469 · Other+65 moreGuadalupe Center Inc — $447,607 · Human ServicesGuadalupe C…BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES — $34,100 · Human ServicesBARRINGTON …+4 more — $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY — $95,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago — $50,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $50,000 · EducationThe Consortium for Independent Journalism Inc — $24,000 · EducationLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL — $9,500 · Education+3 more — $4,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $108,800 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $39,515 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $16,000 · EnvironmentBARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $12,500 · Environment+4 more — $9,600 · EnvironmentRANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE INC — $115,000 · InternationalPOTHAWIRA INTERNATIONAL — $8,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO — $5,000 · International+2 more — $6,500 · InternationalCATO INSTITUTE — $105,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$1,918,800Other$1,783,612Human Services$493,707Education$232,500Environment$186,415International$134,500Public Benefit$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,734,390 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA — $510,193 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $447,607 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC — $142,545 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetRANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE INC — $115,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $108,800 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $105,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY — $95,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCALM INC — $91,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMontecito Union School Foundation — $73,150 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation — $53,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC — $42,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $39,515 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES — $34,100 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetBARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES — $32,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $26,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club — $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetThe Consortium for Independent Journalism Inc — $24,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetNorthwest Community Hospital Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION — $18,425 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA VINTNERS FOUNDATION — $14,765 over 3y, 64% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC — $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC — $12,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $12,069 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE — $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL — $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC — $9,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPOTHAWIRA INTERNATIONAL — $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCATLOW 1927 FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF BARRINGTON'S WHITE HOUSE — $6,010 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSanta Barbara Bucket Brigade — $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TIMBERS FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER — $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBARRINGTON GIVING DAY — $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds CALM INC ↗
  • Who funds Montecito Union School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club ↗
  • Who funds The Consortium for Independent Journalism Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Community Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA VINTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara Foundat…Ann Jackson Family Fo…Hutton Foundation Dba…The Lucky One Foundat…Williams-Corbett Foun…The Little One Founda…June G Outhwaite Char…Patricia Bragg Founda…The Corwith FundTony and Kyra Rogers …The B & B FoundationG a Fowler Family Fou…
Santa Barbara FoundationCA37.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Lucky One Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · The Little One Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Patricia Bragg Foundation · The Corwith Fund · Tony and Kyra Rogers Foundation · The B & B Foundation · G a Fowler Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yellow-Crowned Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines