Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lucky One Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$665k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Arts & Culture$703kEnvironment$515kHuman Services$350kEducation$258kHealth$155kPhilanthropy$145kFood & Nutrition$85kRecreation & Sports$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $415k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $215k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GANNA WLASKA LOTUSLAND$105,000
BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC$60,000
CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION$50,000
MUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST$40,000
PUPPIES BEHIND BARS$25,000
THE RIVIERA RIDGE SCHOOL$25,000
IMPACTASSETS INC$25,000
REBOOT INC$25,000
UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA$25,000
THE EDIBLE SCHOOLYARD PROJECT$25,000
THE GREEN RIVER FOUNDATION$25,000
KISS THE GROUND$20,000
MOXI THE WOLF MUSEUM$20,000
STOTYTELLER CHILDREN'S CENTER$20,000
LIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $35k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $25k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $25k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $25k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $15k → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $10k → 17%ADAM'S ANGELS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
SD
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 43 repeat orgs$336k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
15

Total granted

$2.3M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+26%

Still filing today

72%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GW
    GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $230k · revenue +100%
  • PB
    PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $135k · revenue +69%
  • CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • CH
    CONSIDER HAITI
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -46%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • PA
    PACOLET AREA CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
4
The Land Trust for Santa Barbara County

To conserve natural resources, agricultural land and open spaces for present and future generations.

Environment
5
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
8
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
9
Santa Barbara Zoological Foundation

The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.

Animals
10
Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

Rancho santa ana botanic gardens promotes botany, conservation, and horticulture to inspire, inform and educate the public and scientific community about california's native flora. the garden is devoted to the collection, cultivation,…

Environment
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
Santa Barbara Channelkeeper Inc

The organization was established to protect and restore the santa barbara channel and its watersheds through science-based advocacy, education, field work, community engagement, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is The Edible Schoolyard Project dba the Alice Waters Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%6%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%29%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%4%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/58
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,920

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
36/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $230,000 · OtherGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLANDMOXI THE WOLF MUSEUM — $160,000 · OtherMOXI THE WOLF MUSEUMLIMITLESS HORIZONS — $125,000 · OtherLIMITLESS HORIZONSLOTUSLAND — $90,000 · OtherLOTUSLANDSTEPS TO HOPE INC — $52,500 · OtherDIGNITYMOVES — $55,000 · OtherCALM INC — $45,000 · Other+39 more — $583,000 · Other+39 moreMUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST — $160,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ACADEMY OF…CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE VISIONS…THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $95,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PERLMAN MUSI…TRYON LITTLE THEATER INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureTRYON LITTLE THE…+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC — $95,000 · EducationLIMITLESS H…The Riviera Ridge School — $60,000 · EducationThe Riviera…BARD COLLEGE — $35,000 · EducationBARD COLLEG…Classical Academies CFA Inc — $30,000 · EducationClassical A…The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $25,000 · EducationThe Edible …UCLA FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDA…UNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $85,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · PhilanthropyBELLOSGUA…IMPACTASSETSINC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACTASS…GREEN RIVER FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN RIV…+2 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION — $65,000 · HealthTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION — $35,000 · HealthCONSIDER HAITI — $30,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $15,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $15,000 · HealthPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesADAMS ANGELS — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHERMAL BELT OUTREACH MINISTRY INC — $67,500 · Food & NutritionKISS THE GROUND — $45,000 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $8,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $8,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,340,500Arts & Culture$390,000Education$260,000Philanthropy$210,000Health$160,000Human Services$145,000Food & Nutrition$134,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND — $230,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMUSIC ACADEMY OF THE WEST — $160,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $135,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $95,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetLIMITLESS HORIZONS IXIL INC — $95,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC — $85,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHERMAL BELT OUTREACH MINISTRY INC — $67,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetGWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetThe Riviera Ridge School — $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDIGNITYMOVES — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPS TO HOPE INC — $52,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCALM INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKISS THE GROUND — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOLO TRAINING CENTER SANTA BARBARA — $30,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetCONSIDER HAITI — $30,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetClassical Academies CFA Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN RIVER FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetREBOOT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRYON LITTLE THEATER INC — $25,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTECITO FIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCottage Health — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConserving Carolina — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADAMS ANGELS — $10,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetMOTHERS OF THE AMAZON — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDANCE DOWNTOWN LA INC LA DANCE PROJECT — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA BARBARA SCHOOL OF SQUASH — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR SANTA BARBARA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN SHELTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Little One Founda…Santa Barbara Foundat…Hutton Foundation Dba…Yellow-Crowned Founda…Williams-Corbett Foun…Patricia Bragg Founda…Ann Jackson Family Fo…Manitou FundJune G Outhwaite Char…James S Bower Foundat…Mosher FoundationThe B & B Foundation
The Little One FoundationNY36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Little One Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Yellow-Crowned Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Patricia Bragg Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Manitou Fund · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · James S Bower Foundation · Mosher Foundation · The B & B Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lucky One Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Lucky One Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Lucky One Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines