Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yellow-Crowned Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$590k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$282k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.9MEducation$883kEnvironment$710kHuman Services$620kHealth$159kInternational$128kArts & Culture$117kPublic Benefit$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k38 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $282k
$2,790
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$281,500
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$59,960
MONTECITO UNION SCHOOL FOUNDATION$30,000
GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE$15,000
RANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE$15,000
COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$15,000
BARRINGTON AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,750
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$10,000
FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY$10,000
NEWBERRY LIBRARY$10,000
CATO INSTITUTE$10,000
CALM$10,000
HOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$9,750
NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$7,500
MAX MCGRAW WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $494k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $101k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $75k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $73k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $60k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $60k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $28k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $25k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $15k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $10k → 10%AFRICAN WOMEN RISING: $1k → 14%CLEARBROOK CENTER: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%BARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
RI
CA
CO
VA
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 71 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

71 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
25

Total granted

$4.8M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+21%

Still filing today

79%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +84%
  • THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $510k · revenue +561%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $448k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • GW
    George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • NC
    Northwest Community Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -3%
  • GS
    GWENDOLYN STRONG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

—
8
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
9
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
10
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dre Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/83
Grantees still filing
58/83
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $1,734,390 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INCBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC: $142,545 · PhilanthropyBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC+6 more: $41,865 · PhilanthropyTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $510,193 · OtherTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDAPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL: $313,500 · OtherPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOLHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $162,500 · OtherHOLY TRINITY HIGH SCHOOLFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY: $95,600 · OtherFLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITYMontecito Union School Foundation: $73,150 · OtherCALM INC: $91,200 · Other+65 more: $537,469 · Other+65 moreGuadalupe Center Inc: $447,607 · Human ServicesGuadalupe C…BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $34,100 · Human ServicesBARRINGTON …+4 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $95,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $50,000 · EducationThe Consortium for Independent Journalism Inc: $24,000 · EducationLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL: $9,500 · Education+3 more: $4,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $108,800 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $39,515 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $16,000 · EnvironmentBARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $12,500 · Environment+4 more: $9,600 · EnvironmentRANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE INC: $115,000 · InternationalPOTHAWIRA INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $5,000 · International+2 more: $6,500 · InternationalCATO INSTITUTE: $105,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$1,918,800Other$1,783,612Human Services$493,707Education$232,500Environment$186,415International$134,500Public Benefit$105,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $1,734,390 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $510,193 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $447,607 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC: $142,545 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetRANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE INC: $115,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $108,800 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $105,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWBERRY LIBRARY: $95,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCALM INC: $91,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMontecito Union School Foundation: $73,150 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetMax McGraw Wildlife Foundation: $53,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $42,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $39,515 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $34,100 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetBARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $32,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $26,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club: $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetThe Consortium for Independent Journalism Inc: $24,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetNorthwest Community Hospital Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $18,425 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA VINTNERS FOUNDATION: $14,765 over 3y, 64% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC: $12,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND: $12,069 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL: $9,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $9,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPOTHAWIRA INTERNATIONAL: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCATLOW 1927 FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF BARRINGTON'S WHITE HOUSE: $6,010 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBARRINGTON AREA COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSanta Barbara Bucket Brigade: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBear Necessities Pediatric Cancer Foundation: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TIMBERS FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBARRINGTON GIVING DAY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON AREA COMM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH BOURNE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWBERRY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds CALM INC ↗
  • Who funds Montecito Union School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON CHILDRENS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds George Werden Buck Boys & Girls Club ↗
  • Who funds The Consortium for Independent Journalism Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Community Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA VINTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON AREA CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LAGUNA BLANCA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Barbara FoundationCA37.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Lucky One Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · The Little One Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Patricia Bragg Foundation · The Corwith Fund · Tony and Kyra Rogers Foundation · The B & B Foundation · G a Fowler Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yellow-Crowned Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yellow-Crowned Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yellow-Crowned’s filings →

More from the funding graph