Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yellow Boulder Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$326kInternational$160kPhilanthropy$134kFood & Nutrition$126kHuman Services$56kEducation$40kAnimals$30kYouth Development$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$4,200
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$60,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
TEAM RUBICON$25,000
SKIDMORE COLLEGE$20,000
MID OHIO FOOD COLLECTIVE$20,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$15,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$10,000
VETERAN COMPANION ANIMAL SERVICE$10,000
ANGUILLA MUSIC ACADEMY$10,000
OHIO ECOLOGICAL FOOD AND FARM ASSN$5,000
A KID AGAIN$5,000
THE BRIAN MUHA FOUNDATION$5,000
SIGNIFICANCE OF ONE$4,200
CAPITAL AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$3,000
CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A KID AGAIN: $5k → 15%COMMON GROUND FREE STORE MINISTRY: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
KY
MD
AZ
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$765k · 13 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$765k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

62%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $229k · revenue +9%
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $160k · revenue +18%
  • VC
    VETERAN COMPANION ANIMAL SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • NC
    NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • TC
    TEEN CANCER AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Ohio Tri County Food Alliance Dba Second Harvest Food Bank

The mission of ohio tri county food alliance/second harvest food bank is to alleviate hunger in clark, champaign, and logan counties by sourcing and distributing nutritious food to people in need, building community partnerships, and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Cota - Children's Organ Transplant Association

The Children's Organ Transplant Association helps children and young adults who need a life-saving transplant by providing fundraising assistance and family support.

—
4
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
5
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
6
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
7
Beyond Celiac

Beyond celiac unites with patients and partners to drive diagnosis, advance research, and accelerate the discovery of new treatments and a cure.

Health
8
Columbus Medical Association Foundation

The columbus medical association foundation, through the governance and oversight of its board of physicians and other experts, effects change within specific priority areas to improve the health and wellbeing of the residents and…

Health
9
CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International
10
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
11
Trust for Americas Health

Trust for Americas Health promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority.

Education
12
Adult Congenital Heart Association

To empower the congenital heart disease (chd) community by advancing access to resources and specialized care that improve patient-centered outcomes.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is 5KforJK Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mid-Ohio Foodbank: $110,000 · OtherMid-Ohio FoodbankFIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUST: $100,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE TRUSTMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONTHE BRIAN MUHA FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherTHE BRIAN MUHA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSIGNIFICANCE OF ONE: $21,950 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+16 more: $43,500 · Other+16 moreCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $229,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INCCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $53,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION5KforJK Inc: $22,500 · Health5KforJK Inc+4 more: $16,500 · HealthTEAM RUBICON INC: $160,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTEAM RUBICON INC+1 more: $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationVETERAN COMPANION ANIMAL SERVICES: $26,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $1,000 · AnimalsTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEAM FOCUS INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentA KID AGAIN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON GROUND FREE STORE: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$413,450Health$321,000Public Safety & Disaster$162,500Education$40,000Animals$27,000Youth Development$12,500Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $229,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $160,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $53,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETERAN COMPANION ANIMAL SERVICES: $26,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budget5KforJK Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetTEEN CANCER AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY NEW ALBANY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOhio Ecological Food and Farm Assoc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCAPITAL AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEAM FOCUS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLETON TOWN HALL ARTS CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMissions on Wheels Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCITIZENS FOR HUMANE ACTION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMCORE Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VETERAN COMPANION ANIMAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds 5KforJK Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CANCER AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY NEW ALBANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Ecological Food and Farm Assoc ↗
  • Who funds A KID AGAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TEAM FOCUS INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLETON TOWN HALL ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Missions on Wheels Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR HUMANE ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds MCORE Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND FREE STORE ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF DELAWARE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yellow Boulder Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yellow Boulder Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yellow Boulder Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Yellow Boulder Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yellow Boulder’s filings →

    More from the funding graph