Skip to content
Yang Jing Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Yang Jing Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$274kArts & Culture$251kInternational$164kEducation$81kHuman Services$73kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$21kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GAGE ACADEMY OF ART$50,000
WAJAMAMA FOUNDATION$20,000
UPLIFT INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
MSI US$10,000
MOVING HEALTH INC$10,000
ALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS$10,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS$10,000
BINA FARM INC$10,000
OMPRAKASH INC$6,150
TOSTAN INC$5,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION$5,000
WAJAMAMA FOUNDATION$2,320
VILLAGEREACH$1,000
PHYSICIANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MOVING HEALTH INC: $28k → 7%OKOA PROJECT INC: $15k → 16%MOVING HEALTH INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$881k · 18 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$881k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
0%

Still filing today

78%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GAGE ACADEMY OF ART
    6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +118%
  • TI
    TOSTAN INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +4%
  • MH
    MOVING HEALTH INC FKA THE OKOA PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $53k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • PS
    PROJECT SOAR MARRAKECH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -34%
  • NY
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY Leonard N Stern School of Bu
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • BELONG Partnersgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
2
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
3
Mali Health Organizing Project Inc

Mali Health improves maternal and child health by supporting women, communities, and the community health system to develop local solutions that ensure every mother and child has access to quality primary care. We aim to end preventable…

Community Improvement
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation

The mission of Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation is to advance scientific knowledge in the fields of reproductive biology and women's health; translate this knowledge into improved health for women and infants; train current…

Health
6
Engenderhealth Inc

Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)

International
7
Population Action International

Pai advances evidence, policies and programs to enable women, youth and at-risk communities to access sexual and reproductive health as core to health equity, climate resilience, economic well-being and gender equality.

Health
8
Planned Parenthood Global Inc

To advance the planned parenthood mission internationally, including support for the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services and rights, and ensuring that all people have access to reproductive and sexual…

Health
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Gynuity Health Projects Inc

Gynuity health projects works to develop and advocate for the use of scientific, clinical and programmatic evidence in reproductive and maternal health, assuring that each individual benefits from the fruits of medical science and…

Health
11
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
12
Bio Ventures for Global Health

BVGH drives sustainable, market-informed solutions to improve access to quality healthcare in low- and middle-income countries. BVGH builds cross-sector partnerships that align industry, government, and local health-system priorities to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tostan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womens Funding Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - UW MEDICINE: $120,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON - UW MEDICINEGuttmacher Institute Inc: $91,000 · OtherGuttmacher Institute IncALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS: $57,500 · OtherALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARSWAJAMAMA FOUNDATION: $42,320 · OtherWAJAMAMA FOUNDATIONTOSTAN INC: $30,000 · OtherTOSTAN INC+7 more: $15,000 · OtherGAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $220,000 · Arts & CultureGAGE ACADEMY OF ARTTOSTAN INC: $53,100 · InternationalTOSTAN INCUPLIFT INTERNATIONAL INC: $43,000 · InternationalUPLIFT INTERN…PROJECT SOAR MARRAKECH: $20,000 · InternationalPROJECT SOAR …SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $55,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENT…OMPRAKASH INC: $26,550 · PhilanthropyOMPRAKASH I…MSI US: $11,000 · PhilanthropyMSI USWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND: $35,000 · HealthWORLDWIDE …PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 · HealthPARTNERS I…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $14,500 · HealthPLANNED PA…THE BINA FARM INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE BINA F…MOVING HEALTH INC FKA THE OKOA PROJECT INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesNew York University: $15,000 · EducationLAKESIDE SCHOOL: $7,500 · EducationVILLAGEREACH: $1,000 · Education
Other$355,820Arts & Culture$220,000International$116,100Philanthropy$92,550Health$89,500Human Services$52,500Education$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGAGE ACADEMY OF ART: $220,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $91,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALEXANDER HAMILTON SCHOLARS: $57,500 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $55,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTOSTAN INC: $53,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOVING HEALTH INC FKA THE OKOA PROJECT INC: $52,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetUPLIFT INTERNATIONAL INC: $43,000 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND: $35,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOMPRAKASH INC: $26,550 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT SOAR MARRAKECH: $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNew York University: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMSI US: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESIDE SCHOOL: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Funding Alliance: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFORTISSIMO: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELONG Partners: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE BY ONE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationGates FoundationMorgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Online Givin…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
Seattle FoundationWA23.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Gates Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yang Jing Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yang Jing Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yang Jing’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home