Skip to content
Xactlyone Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Xactlyone Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2026still arriving
21
Grants FY2026still arriving
9
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$190kHuman Services$77kFood & Nutrition$72kEducation$48kYouth Development$46kEnvironment$34kInternational$34kCivil Rights$22kOther$0
02FY2026 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k15 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$715k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$20,000
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN$20,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$20,000
FEEDING AMERICA$20,000
KINDKART$15,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION - GEATER CINCINNATI GO RED FOR WOMEN$2,500
DENVER SANTA CLAUS SHOP$2,500
SANTA'S HELPERS FOUNDATIOIN$2,500
DENVER FOOD RESCUE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
OURAY MOUNTAIN SEARCH AND RESCUE$2,000
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$2,000
ALS ASSOCIATION$1,500
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%GOOD KARMA BIKES: $2k → 8%SANTA'S HELPERS FOUNDATIOIN: $3k → 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%BLANKET FOR HOPE: $1k → 7%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%GIRLS WHO CODE: $5k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $3k → 5%NATIONAL CARES MENTORING MOVEMENT: $3k → 17%A Precious Child: $1k → 5%Sacred Heart Community Service: $3k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $2k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $250 → 8%A LITTLE HELP: $2k → 12%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$218k · 21 repeat orgs$368k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 17 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
101

Total granted

$218k
$254k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+3%

Still filing today

57%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CODEORG
    3× · 2018–2025 · $27k · revenue +26%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    4× · 2017–2022 · $11k · revenue +81%
  • AP
    A PRECIOUS CHILD INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +47%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • CH
    Craig Hospital Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +156%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

—
8
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
9
Ceo Roundtable On Cancer Inc

The mission of the ceo roundtable on cancer is to make continual progress toward the elimination of cancer as a personal disease and public health problem through initiatives that reduce the risk of cancer, enable early diagnosis,…

Health
10
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Santas Helpers Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/73
Grantees still filing
46/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALWAYS DREAM FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherUCSF Children's Hospitals: $15,000 · OtherFeeding America: $22,000 · OtherFeeding AmericaHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $20,000 · OtherHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INCKINDKART INC: $15,000 · Other+90 more: $231,386 · Other+90 moreNAMI National: $20,000 · HealthNAMI NationalMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $10,226 · HealthMOVEMBER FOUNDAT…CENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $10,000 · HealthCENTER FOR DISEA…Craig Hospital Foundation: $6,025 · HealthCraig Hospital F…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,920 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC: $5,000 · HealthHEAD STRONG PROJ…American Diabetes Association: $4,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,600 · Health+9 more: $15,000 · Health+9 moreA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $7,491 · Human ServicesSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5,660 · Human ServicesBACK ON MY FEET: $5,600 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNational Cares Mentoring Movement Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesSANTAS HELPERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesGOOD KARMA BIKES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesA LITTLE HELP: $2,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesCODEORG: $27,000 · EducationHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $2,500 · Education+2 more: $1,500 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $5,900 · Youth DevelopmentMake A Chess Move: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentLATINITAS INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentOUR CITY FOREST: $2,815 · EnvironmentProtect Our Rivers: $2,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE WORLD INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation: $5,272 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$358,886Health$84,771Human Services$41,751Education$31,000Youth Development$30,900Environment$25,815Philanthropy$25,272

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCODEORG: $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $11,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $10,226 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $7,491 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $6,025 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,920 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE ROCKIES: $5,900 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5,660 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $5,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $5,272 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECT TO COMPETE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHarbor House of Central Florida Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTALLER SALUD INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHappy Hollow Foundation: $3,722 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Cares Mentoring Movement Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR CITY FOREST: $2,815 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake A Chess Move: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE SERVICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPUNZEL PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLATINITAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProtect Our Rivers: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWrestle Like a Girl Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD KARMA BIKES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetACHIEVING CURES TOGETHER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetA LITTLE HELP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJuntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc: $1,222 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationColorado Gives Founda…The Colorado Health F…Silicon Valley Commun…Rose Community Founda…San Jose Mercury News…The Anschutz Foundati…Tides FoundationAnschutz Family Found…Daniels FundEl Pomar FoundationMile High United Way …
The Denver FoundationCO22.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Anschutz Foundation · Tides Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Daniels Fund · El Pomar Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Xactlyone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Xactlyone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Harbor House of Central Florida Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Center for Disease Dynamics Economics & Policy Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Xactlyone Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Xactlyone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Xactlyone’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home