Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wylie Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$25kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$10kYouth Development$9kPhilanthropy$3kEnvironment$2kEducation$323Health$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$337k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRED HEART CHURCH$3,260
Individual grant recipient$1,200
FARM TO FAMILY FUND$500
Individual grant recipient$120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Girl Ventures: $7k → 10%Spencer Pride: $10k → 14%GIRL VENTURES: $2k → 10%GIRL VENTURES: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$37k · 5 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$37k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+54%

Still filing today

40%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SACRED HEART CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $23k
  • G
    GIRLVENTURES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $9k · revenue -26%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k

Funded once

  • SP
    SPENCER PRIDEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +129%
  • MH
    MOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -26%
  • HH
    HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
2
Bloomington Food Policy Council Inc

The Bloomington Food Policy Council is a group of community members committed to building food security by assessing the current food system, advocating policy changes to improve it, and educating the public on concrete steps we can all…

Food & Nutrition
3
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

4
Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated

The central indiana land trust, inc. preserves the best of central indiana's natural areas, protecting plants and animals, so hoosiers can experience the wonder of the state's natural heritage.

Environment
5
Shirley Heinze Land Trust Inc

To preserve and restore natural lands and waters in northwestern indiana, and to engage people in nature and conservation

Environment
6
Partners in Food and Farming

PIFFs mission is to change the narrative around food and farming in Indiana by increasing farm viability and convening partners for collaborative, systems-level change.

Food & Nutrition
7
Indiana Conservation Voters

Icv ensures indiana's elected officials are accountable to hoosiers who all deserve clean energy, clean water and clean air.

8
Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc

Gleaners' mission is to be a leader in the fight against hunger. we do this by joining with others to optimize equitable access to nutritious food for those of us facing hunger and working to overcome the conditions causing food insecurity.

9
Food Bank of Northwest Indiana Inc

To provide food to various charitable organizations and needy individuals in northwest indiana.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
11
Tri-State Food Bank

Tri-state food bank, inc solicits, warehouses, and disburses donated and purchased food products to other not-for-profit entities in indiana, illinois, and kentucky.

12
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Farm to Family Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SACRED HEART CHURCH — $23,460 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $2,712 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+5 more — $2,800 · Other+5 moreSPENCER PRIDE — $10,000 · Human ServicesSPENCER PRIDEGIRLVENTURES — $8,636 · Human ServicesGIRLVENTURESMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC — $7,564 · Food & NutritionMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INCHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC — $7,500 · Food & NutritionHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INCFARM TO FAMILY FUND — $1,500 · Food & NutritionFARM TO FAMILY FUNDPantry 279 Inc — $1,000 · Food & NutritionPantry 279 IncSYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED — $1,030 · EnvironmentINDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC — $500 · EnvironmentDONORSCHOOSEORG — $323 · Education
Other$31,472Human Services$18,636Food & Nutrition$17,564Environment$1,530Education$323

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPENCER PRIDE — $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetGIRLVENTURES — $8,636 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC — $7,564 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARM TO FAMILY FUND — $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED — $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPantry 279 Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $323 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPENCER PRIDE
  • Who funds GIRLVENTURES
  • Who funds MOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC
  • Who funds HOOSIER HILLS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds FARM TO FAMILY FUND
  • Who funds SYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Pantry 279 Inc
  • Who funds INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · Asante Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Bloomington and Monroe County Inc · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wylie Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph