Skip to content

California · Public charity

Working Partnerships USA

Working Partnerships USA is a community organization bringing together the power of grassroots organizing and public policy innovation to drive the movement for a just economy. We build the capacity of workers, low-income neighborhoods and communities of color to lead and govern. Based in Silicon Valley, we tackle the root causes of…

$1.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Itemized grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$1.1M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$60,513
Largest grant, FY2024
$363,043
Organizations funded a year
5 to 20
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$9.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Working Partnerships USA funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentCivil RightsArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$1.1M11%
FY202310$1.1M0%
FY202215$1.2M20%
FY202120$1.8M30%
FY202015$1.1M20%
FY201911$246k91%
FY201810$387k60%
FY20175$220kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$2.1MEmployment$2.0MCrime & Legal$1.7MHuman Services$844kFood & Nutrition$197kPublic Benefit$83kCivil Rights$80kArts & Culture$77kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 34 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Working Partnerships USA supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 33 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStep Forward Foundation: $1,634,121 over 6y, 22% of budgetSan Mateo County Union Community Alliance: $1,153,702 over 5y, 38% of budgetEnterprise Foundation: $474,904 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetSilicon Valley Rising Action: $450,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetVietnamese American Roundtable: $417,918 over 6y, 52% of budgetThe Prosperity Lab: $413,129 over 5y, 43% of budgetDay Worker Center of Mountain View: $410,302 over 6y, 11% of budgetHuman Agenda: $365,004 over 5y, 18% of budgetEast Bay Alliance For A Sustainable Economy: $230,766 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetCommunity Partners: $199,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWarehouse Worker Resource Center: $164,571 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetSomos Mayfair Inc: $163,950 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetJobs with Justice San Francisco: $131,666 over 3y, 10% of budgetPowerswitch Action: $121,181 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNational Employment Law Project: $112,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTradeswomen Incorporated: $103,633 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetWorksafe Inc: $96,150 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetKorean Immigrant Workers Advocates of Southern California: $77,054 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSf Clout: $76,811 over 2y, 11% of budgetCenter for Empowered Politics: $41,740 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLos Angeles Alliance for a New Economy: $37,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCollins Foundations: $27,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter on Policy Initiatives: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUnited for Respect Education Fund: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChinese Progressive Association: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSacred Heart Community Service: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLatinos United for a New America: $15,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetMonument Impact: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNorth Bay Organizing Project: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUrban Habitat Program: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNorth Bay Jobs With Justice: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetValley Health Foundation (Vhf): $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 33.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The James Irvine FoundationCA28.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The James Irvine Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Center · The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Korean Immigrant Workers Advocates of Southern California · Powerswitch Action · The California Endowment · United Way of the Bay Area · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Latino Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Working Partnerships USA with peer funders

About Working Partnerships USA

How much does Working Partnerships USA give?
Working Partnerships USA reported 9 itemized grants totaling $1,066,043, out of $1,213,325 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 20 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Working Partnerships USA fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Community Improvement (29%), Employment (28%), Crime & Legal (23%).
Who are Working Partnerships USA's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Step Forward Foundation ($1.6M), San Mateo County Union Community Alliance ($1.2M), Enterprise Foundation ($475k).
Does Working Partnerships USA fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Working Partnerships USA?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The James Irvine Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Tides Center.
Where is Working Partnerships USA based?
Working Partnerships USA is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Working Partnerships USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph