Skip to content

· Public charity

Womens Club of Scc Charities

This organization's mission is to mobilize the sugarloaf community to support local charities whose purpose is to improve the financial, emotional and/or physical well being of families and individuals living in gwinnett county.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$997kRecreation & Sports$339kHousing & Shelter$234kCrime & Legal$160kEducation$106kHealth$36kPhilanthropy$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $169k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
$33,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRDIES FOR CHARITY$92,000
SPECIAL NEEDS SCHOOLS OF GWIN$33,800
ANNANDALE VILLAGE$33,800
DULUTH COOPERATIVE MINISTRY$33,800
HOME OF HOPE AT GWINNETT CHIL$33,800
RAINBOW VILLAGE$33,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $47k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $45k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $37k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $34k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $33k → 9%THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION: $33k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 15 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+97%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QC
    QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $367k · revenue +52%
  • TN
    THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $229k · revenue +11%
  • RV
    RAINBOW VILLAGE INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • SA
    SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $36k · revenue +97%
  • WF
    WES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Community Support and Solutions Inc

InCommunity provides meaningful support to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live safe, healthy, and joyful lives in their communities.

—
2
Special Abilities of North Texas Inc

To provide the highest quality care, training and support to adults with special needs, giving them opportunities to succeed in life.

Human Services
3
Noahs House

The organization provides opportunities for growth, independence, and fulfillment for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities by offering a loving, nurturing, and affordable residential community, along with structured…

Housing & Shelter
4
Chatham County Group Homes Inc

To provide a normal home life for residents without regard to their disabilities, race, sex, religion, or creed by integrating them into community life whenever possible.

Human Services
5
Springwell Network Inc

To provide quality (innovative) care and training for individuals within our community who face challenges of mental or intellectual disabilities. we provide a safe, supportive and structured living environment for people to exercise their…

Human Services
6
Green Oaks Center

Educational and work activities for the mentally challenged citizens of colquitt and worth counties of georgia.

Human Services
7
Easter Seals East Georgia Inc

Easter Seals East Georgia's mission is to provide exceptional services to ensure that people with disabilities and barriers to employment maximize their potential for employment and independence and broaden their opportunities for full…

Human Services
8
Georgia Agape Inc

The organization offers social services as a compassionate outreach to abused, neglected and dependent children and families in need. the organization strives to positively impact the lives of children, families and all those who receive…

—
9
Wesley Glen Ministries Inc

We are a Christian organization that supports people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In a Christian environment, we seek to enrich the lives of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, encouraging them to…

—
10
Aveyron Homes Inc

Aveyron homes inc assists people with special, individual needs by providing caring homes and or support services.

—
11
The Arc Gateway Inc

To provide services to people with developmental disabilities.

—
12
Special Needs Cobb Inc

Special Needs Cobb, Inc. is committed to promoting opportunities for all people with developmental disabilities to live full, productive, self-determined lives of the highest quality by fostering local communities which embrace all people.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $269,930 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSpecial Needs Schools of Gwinnett Inc: $139,800 · OtherSpecial Needs Schools of Gwinnett IncPARTNERS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $107,000 · OtherPARTNERS AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCEIndividual grant recipient: $66,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWCSCC CHARITIES INC: $65,217 · OtherWCSCC CHARITIES INCCONNECTIONS HOMES INC: $58,000 · OtherCONNECTIONS HOMES INCNEW DIRECTIONS: $55,000 · OtherNEW DIRECTIONS+1 more: $8,000 · OtherQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $367,000 · PhilanthropyQUAD CITIES GOLF C…MOSAIC GEORGIA INC: $159,680 · HealthMOSAIC GEORGIA INCThe Annandale Foundation Inc: $123,680 · HealthThe Annandale Foun…SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC: $35,500 · HealthSPECTRUM AUTISM SU…Annandale At Suwanee Inc: $33,800 · HealthAnnandale At Suwan…THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC: $228,680 · Human ServicesTHE NEXT STOP FOU…GWINNETT CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $116,480 · Human ServicesGWINNETT CHILDREN…RAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $209,800 · Housing & ShelterRAINBOW VI…Wellspring Living Inc: $65,000 · ReligionPGA TOUR CHARITIES INC: $64,250 · Youth DevelopmentHANDS OF CHRIST A DULUTH COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC: $33,800 · Food & Nutrition
Other$769,197Philanthropy$367,000Health$352,660Human Services$345,160Housing & Shelter$209,800Religion$65,000Youth Development$64,250Food & Nutrition$33,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $367,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC: $228,680 over 6y, 19% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC: $209,800 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetMOSAIC GEORGIA INC: $159,680 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetSpecial Needs Schools of Gwinnett Inc: $139,800 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetThe Annandale Foundation Inc: $123,680 over 4y, 35% of budgetGWINNETT CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $116,480 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPGA TOUR CHARITIES INC: $64,250 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS HOMES INC: $58,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetSPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC: $35,500 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetAnnandale At Suwanee Inc: $33,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NEXT STOP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Special Needs Schools of Gwinnett Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Annandale Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GWINNETT CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds PGA TOUR CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM AUTISM SUPPORT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF CHRIST A DULUTH COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Annandale At Suwanee Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Primerica Foundation IncGA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Primerica Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · Jackson Emc Foundation Inc Attn Amy Rouse · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Womens Club of Scc Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Womens Club of Scc Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Womens Club of Scc Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Womens Club of Scc Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Womens Club of Scc Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph