Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Khr McNeely Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
126
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.

Arts & Culture$8.7MEducation$5.3MPhilanthropy$3.9MReligion$2.2MEnvironment$2.1MInternational$945kYouth Development$930kRecreation & Sports$669kOther$0
02FY2024 · 126 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k43 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k69 grants · $7.2M
  • $250k+14 grants · $6.3M
$70,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$257M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY SWITZERLAND INC$1,500,000
PACIFIC REPERTORY THEATRE$600,000
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$575,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM OF ART$500,000
SONOMA VALLEY FILM SOCIETY$500,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$350,000
ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$330,000
THE SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION$325,000
HIGH FIVES FOUNDATION$325,000
THE SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION$250,000
FONDAZIONE LUGAO PER IL POLO CULTURALE$250,000
OAKLAND-ALAMEDA CNTY-EMERYVILLE FIREFIGHTERS$250,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY$250,000
MUSEUM OF THE AFRICAN DIASPORA$250,000
SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$225,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $510k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDSHIP HOME: $50k → 8%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $25k → 8%HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN: $75k → 24%MOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%FRIENDSHIP HOME: $25k → 8%SWEETWATER SPECTRUM: $25k → 8%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $160k → 9%SONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
DC
MS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Khr McNeely Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Khr McNeely Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.8M · 42 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 81 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
24

Total granted

$9.8M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+4%

Still filing today

90%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550k · revenue +85%
  • RL
    ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $500k · revenue +4%
  • WA
    WALKER ART CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $325k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO CATHOLIC ACCOUNT FOR PARISHES AND SCHOOLS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2023 · $2.2M
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +90%
  • SI
    SONOMA INT'L FILM SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $350k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
2
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of Sonoma County

The museum of sonoma county engages and inspires our diverse community with art and history exhibitions, collections, and public programs that are inclusive, educational, and relevant.

Arts & Culture
5
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
6
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
7
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
8
Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
10
Sonoma Plein Air Foundation

Promotion of arts education

Arts & Culture
11
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
12
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is Sonoma Botanical Garden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Local History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Animal Rescue and ShelterSchool District FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Developmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Senior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/117
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,448

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/112
Grantees still filing
57/112
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN DIEGO CATHOLIC ACCOUNT FOR PARISHES AND SCHOOLS INCORPORATED — $2,200,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO CATHOLIC ACCOUNT FOR PARISHES AND…PACIFIC REPERTORY THEATRE — $600,000 · OtherPACIFIC REPERTORY THEATREWHITNEY MUSEUM OF ART — $500,000 · OtherHANNA BOYS CENTER — $440,000 · OtherROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $405,000 · Other+69 more — $6,394,341 · Other+69 moreFRANKLIN SWITZERLAND INC — $2,650,000 · EducationFRANKLIN SWITZERLAND …ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL — $500,000 · EducationROBERT LOUIS STEVENSO…SONOMA ACADEMY — $475,000 · EducationSONOMA ACADEMYFRED T KOREMATSU INSTITUTE — $225,000 · EducationTHE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INC — $200,000 · EducationPUBLICOLOR INC — $200,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University — $200,000 · Education+8 more — $700,000 · Education+8 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $550,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF…WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $500,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AM…SONOMA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL — $500,000 · Arts & CultureSONOMA VALLEY FILM F…WALKER ART CENTER — $325,000 · Arts & CultureWALKER ART CENTERMUSEUM OF THE AFRICAN DIASPORA (MOAD) — $300,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE AFRICA…SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $275,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM…SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Arts & CultureKID SCOOP NEWS — $230,050 · Arts & CultureSebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc — $200,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WILLIAM A FARNSWORTH LIBRARY AND ART MUSEUM INC — $185,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $175,000 · Arts & Culture+23 more — $1,456,200 · Arts & Culture+23 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,075,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANT…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $550,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CH…Sonoma Valley Education Foundation — $210,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $150,000 · PhilanthropyMYRIAD USA INC — $425,000 · InternationalWater for South Sudan Inc — $150,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF POTENTINO INC — $140,000 · InternationalTHE NORMANDY INSTITUTE — $125,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of the Centre Pompidou Inc — $75,000 · InternationalAFRICA SCHOOLHOUSE FOUNDATION — $70,000 · InternationalVICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION — $57,500 · InternationalTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $250,000 · EnvironmentTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE — $150,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE OSA — $100,000 · EnvironmentTAHOE BACKCOUNTRY ALLIANCE — $100,000 · EnvironmentApis Arborea — $100,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGY PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $75,000 · EnvironmentPACIFIC BLUE FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EnvironmentSONOMA LAND TRUST — $75,000 · EnvironmentSANDIEGO350 — $75,000 · EnvironmentSonoma Ecology Center — $40,000 · EnvironmentSONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER — $210,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP HOME INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesHOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesSWEETWATER SPECTRUM INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $50,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN SEED FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human Services
Other$10,539,341Education$5,150,000Arts & Culture$4,946,250Philanthropy$3,985,000International$1,042,500Environment$1,040,000Human Services$510,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,075,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN SWITZERLAND INC — $2,650,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetPACIFIC REPERTORY THEATRE — $600,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $550,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $550,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL — $500,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $500,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL — $500,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetSONOMA ACADEMY — $475,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $425,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER — $325,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE AFRICAN DIASPORA (MOAD) — $300,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $275,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $250,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKID SCOOP NEWS — $230,050 over 2y, 22% of budgetFRED T KOREMATSU INSTITUTE — $225,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetSONOMA COMMUNITY CENTER — $210,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetSonoma Valley Education Foundation — $210,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetPets Lifeline Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetSebastiani Theatre Foundation Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INC — $200,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPUBLICOLOR INC — $200,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLIAM A FARNSWORTH LIBRARY AND ART MUSEUM INC — $185,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC ART FUND INC — $150,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWater for South Sudan Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSONOMA CHILDRENS CREATIVE AND PERFORMING ARTS — $150,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetSonoma Valley Authors Festival — $150,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF POTENTINO INC — $140,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetdi Rosa Preserve — $136,200 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetJOHNNY MAC TENNIS PROJECT INC — $130,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ECOLOGICAL CIVILIZATION — $125,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE NORMANDY INSTITUTE — $125,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance — $125,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $105,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE OSA — $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSONOMA OVERNIGHT SUPPORT INC — $100,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAX RHYMES FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Manitou FundSonoma County Communi…McNabb FoundationMarin Community Found…The Vadasz Family Fou…Sonoma County Vintner…Simon Blattner Family…Women Giving as One I…Jewish Community Fede…The San Francisco Fou…Sanderson Family Foun…The Joseph and Vera L…
Manitou FundMN101.2× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Manitou Fund · Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Vadasz Family Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Simon Blattner Family Foundation · Women Giving as One Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Sanderson Family Foundation · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Khr McNeely Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Friendship Home Inc — 66% of income from government
  • Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Khr McNeely Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Khr McNeely Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home