· Private foundation
Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $107k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $515k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $620k
- $250k+1 grant · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NOYES HOME FOR CHILDREN | $285,000 |
| ADVENT HEALTH FOUNDATION SHAWNEE MISSION | $150,000 |
| NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FDN | $75,000 |
| INTERSERV FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH INC | $75,000 |
| YMCA OF ST JOSEPH | $70,000 |
| HARVESTERS COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK | $50,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NW MISSOURI | $35,000 |
| SAFEHOME | $35,000 |
| ROSE BROOKS CENTER | $35,000 |
| YWCA OF ST JOSEPH | $35,000 |
| STARLIGHT THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
81 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH6× · 2018–2025 · $473k · revenue +1%
- HTHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK6× · 2018–2025 · $350k · revenue +40%
- AKAdventHealth Kansas City Foundation3× · 2023–2025 · $228k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- LDLUBA DBA NOYES HOME FOR CHILDRENone grant, 2018 · $242k
- KCKansas City CARE Clinicone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +18%
- MWMO WESTERN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…
The kansas humane society is a community resource for pets and people, dedicated to enhancing the welfare of all companion animals.
The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…
The kansas city campus for animal care (kccac) is a public-private partnership between the city of kansas city, missouri, and kansas city pet project. (continued on schedule o)the campus is operated by kc pet project, focusing on pet…
Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.
Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.
Find homes for homeless cats through adoptions
The mission of the humane society of jefferson county is to improve the lives of animals in need through compassionate care, adoption, advocacy and education while also inspiring humane communities that foster kindness and respect for all.
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater St Joseph and the most unlike its peers is Whispering Willows Senior Dog Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERSERV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds AdventHealth Kansas City Foundation ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY PET PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY FOOD KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds City Union Mission ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER OF ST JOSEPH INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
- Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH MUSEUMS INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust · Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Heartland Regional Medical Center · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · The Shumaker Family Foundation · Helen N Poston Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.