· Private foundation
Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEARTLAND FOUNDATION | $33,333 |
| CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
| ALBRECHTKEMPER MUSEUM OF ART | $7,500 |
| PONY EXPRESS NATIONAL MUSEUM | $6,750 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KS NW MO | $6,000 |
| PONY EXPRESS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES | $5,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| LADIES UNION BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| YMCA | $4,900 |
| MIDCITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY LEARNING CN | $4,250 |
| FRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC | $3,755 |
| SISTERS OF SOLACE | $3,000 |
| YWCA | $2,500 |
| MISSION HOUSE COVENANT COMMUNITY LIFE RE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHeartland Foundation5× · 2017–2025 · $121k · revenue +367%
- ICINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC2× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +7%
- PPPIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC7× · 2018–2024 · $31k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- FGFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCAREgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +70%
- IFINTERSERV FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -82%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We, saint joseph regional medical center (sjrmc) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.sjrmc is a member of trinity health.
To serve as a catalyst for economic grown and development in northwest missouri
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
To help residents live to their fullest potential, recognizing the changing needs of each person.
To preserve, maintain and restore historical artifacts and information for future generations.
Inspiring healthy living by providing exceptional health and life services for every person, every time.
The st. louis jewish community center enriches lives, builds community, promotes inclusivity and creates meaningful jewish experiences.
St. joseph residence, a skilled nursing home, and marian heights apartments, a residential apartment facility, and trinity terrace & monarch meadows, a community-based residential facility sponsored by catholic health international. we…
We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. mount st. joseph is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.
We, saint joseph regional medical center, inc. and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.saint joseph regional medical center-plymouth campus…
St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Community Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Lettuce Dream. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Heartland Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL POINT TRANSITIONAL HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds ALBRECHT-KEMPER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ST JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds INTERSERV FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SISTERS OF SOLACE ↗
- Who funds PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MIDCITY EXCELLENCE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds AGRICULTURE FUTURE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
- Who funds Ladies Union Benevolent Association ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH MUSEUMS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harry and Helena Messick Charitable Tr · The Community Foundation of Northwest Missouriinc · Norma J and William J Kenney Charitable · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Wm and Margaret Schreiber Char Tr · Heartland Regional Medical Center · Gary G Taylor Charitable Tr · The Depriest Family Foundation Inc · Helen N Poston Charitable Trust · The Sunderland Foundation · Mary Boder Charitable Trust · Spratt Leah Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harold P Dugdale Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.